程序、後果及社會正義:論米勒的混合型正義論

Translated title of the contribution: Procedures, Consequences, and Social Justice: On David Miller's Hybrid Theory of Justice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The difference between procedural justice and consequential justice constitutes a very important conceptual distinction in contemporary theories of justice. Different theories of justice offer different ways of understanding procedures, consequences and the conceptual relationship between them. This paper attempts to explore the roles of procedural justice and consequential justice in theories of justice. The main focus is to examine the development of David Miller's theory of justice and reveal its distinctiveness. Rawls's notions of ”pure procedural justice”, ”perfect procedural justice” and ”imperfect procedural justice” will be discussed for the purpose of constructing an analytical framework to accommodate different theories of justice, including process theories, outcome theories and hybrid theories. According to our analysis, Miller's theory has changed from an outcome theory to a hybrid theory of justice. This change stimulates us to rethink the ways by which social justice theory may be constructed.
Translated title of the contributionProcedures, Consequences, and Social Justice: On David Miller's Hybrid Theory of Justice
Original languageChinese (Traditional)
Pages (from-to)217-269
Number of pages53
Journal人文及社會科學集刊 = Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005 Jun 1

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Procedures, Consequences, and Social Justice: On David Miller's Hybrid Theory of Justice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this