TY - JOUR
T1 - 2-Adamantanamine produces prolonged spinal block in rats
AU - Chen, Yu Wen
AU - Chen, Chia Ming
AU - Liu, Kuo Sheng
AU - Wang, Jhi Joung
AU - Hung, Ching Hsia
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the grant (MOST 104-2314-B-039-017-MY3) from the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2017/7/13
Y1 - 2017/7/13
N2 - We aimed to investigate the local anesthetic effect of 2-adamantanamine in spinal anesthesia. The dose–response curves were constructed after intrathecally injecting the rats with five doses of 2-adamantanamine and a common local anesthetic mepivacaine. The quality and duration of 2-adamantanamine at producing spinal nociceptive, proprioceptive and motor block were compared with that of mepivacaine. We revealed that 2-adamantanamine provoked spinal nociceptive, proprioceptive and motor block dose-dependently. On the 50% effective dose (ED50) basis, the rank of potency was mepivacaine > 2-adamantanamine at producing spinal nociceptive, proprioceptive and motor block (p < 0.05 for the differences). 2-Adamantanamine, but not mepivacaine produced more nociceptive block than motor block (p < 0.05). At the equianesthetic doses (ED75, ED50, and ED25), the nociceptive block duration caused by 2-adamantanamine was greater than that caused by mepivacaine (p < 0.01 for the differences). These preclinical data showed that 2-adamantanamine is less potent than mepivacaine, while 2-adamantanamine provokes greater duration of spinal nociceptive block than mepivacaine. Furthermore, 2-adamantanamine demonstrates a more nociceptive-selective action over motor block.
AB - We aimed to investigate the local anesthetic effect of 2-adamantanamine in spinal anesthesia. The dose–response curves were constructed after intrathecally injecting the rats with five doses of 2-adamantanamine and a common local anesthetic mepivacaine. The quality and duration of 2-adamantanamine at producing spinal nociceptive, proprioceptive and motor block were compared with that of mepivacaine. We revealed that 2-adamantanamine provoked spinal nociceptive, proprioceptive and motor block dose-dependently. On the 50% effective dose (ED50) basis, the rank of potency was mepivacaine > 2-adamantanamine at producing spinal nociceptive, proprioceptive and motor block (p < 0.05 for the differences). 2-Adamantanamine, but not mepivacaine produced more nociceptive block than motor block (p < 0.05). At the equianesthetic doses (ED75, ED50, and ED25), the nociceptive block duration caused by 2-adamantanamine was greater than that caused by mepivacaine (p < 0.01 for the differences). These preclinical data showed that 2-adamantanamine is less potent than mepivacaine, while 2-adamantanamine provokes greater duration of spinal nociceptive block than mepivacaine. Furthermore, 2-adamantanamine demonstrates a more nociceptive-selective action over motor block.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020031630&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020031630&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.05.043
DO - 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.05.043
M3 - Article
C2 - 28549932
AN - SCOPUS:85020031630
SN - 0304-3940
VL - 653
SP - 168
EP - 172
JO - Neuroscience Letters
JF - Neuroscience Letters
ER -