A comparison of LIDAR waeveform decomposition models

Cheng Kai Wang, Chi-Kuei Wang, Yi-Hsing Tseng

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

The storage capability of full waveform is the state-of-the-art technology of LIDAR. In addition to the 3D point information recorded by conventional LIDAR systems, waveform LIDAR systems encode the intensity of returned signal along the time domain. This provides a user the possibility to decompose the waveform for the detection of illuminated target points. Therefore, the locations of the illuminated targets can be refined by analyzing the waveform data. So far, a standard approach to waveform decomposition is still not available. A waveform may be a composition of some prominent, overlapped and weak return pulses. A waveform decomposition method may easily detect a prominent return pulse, but it usually has some difficulties to deal with overlapped and weak pulses. In this paper, a waveform fitting method which takes the overlapped pulses into consideration will be applied. To fit a waveform, the number of returns is needed. The initial number of returns commonly is determined by a simple way such as the number of local maximum of a waveform which is influenced by noises and overlapped echoes. For this reason, the wavelet transform is used to estimate the initial number of returns in this research. Moreover, compared with taking Gaussian as the fitting basic model, another basic model, log-normal is included. Our preliminary results show the effectiveness of wavelet transform to determine the initial number and the ability to detect overlapped pulses. The Log-normal model has better fitting results than Gaussian model in forest areas. As the results, the points extracted by our developed methods increase compared with the points extracted by commercial system. The increased points can be useful to future applications especially in a forest area.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication32nd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2011, ACRS 2011
Pages449-454
Number of pages6
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Dec 1
Event32nd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2011, ACRS 2011 - Tapei, Taiwan
Duration: 2011 Oct 32011 Oct 7

Publication series

Name32nd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2011, ACRS 2011
Volume1

Other

Other32nd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2011, ACRS 2011
CountryTaiwan
CityTapei
Period11-10-0311-10-07

Fingerprint

Decomposition
Wavelet transforms
Chemical analysis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Computer Networks and Communications

Cite this

Wang, C. K., Wang, C-K., & Tseng, Y-H. (2011). A comparison of LIDAR waeveform decomposition models. In 32nd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2011, ACRS 2011 (pp. 449-454). (32nd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2011, ACRS 2011; Vol. 1).
Wang, Cheng Kai ; Wang, Chi-Kuei ; Tseng, Yi-Hsing. / A comparison of LIDAR waeveform decomposition models. 32nd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2011, ACRS 2011. 2011. pp. 449-454 (32nd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2011, ACRS 2011).
@inproceedings{fb9359208f6c4e7f832f1c604491e595,
title = "A comparison of LIDAR waeveform decomposition models",
abstract = "The storage capability of full waveform is the state-of-the-art technology of LIDAR. In addition to the 3D point information recorded by conventional LIDAR systems, waveform LIDAR systems encode the intensity of returned signal along the time domain. This provides a user the possibility to decompose the waveform for the detection of illuminated target points. Therefore, the locations of the illuminated targets can be refined by analyzing the waveform data. So far, a standard approach to waveform decomposition is still not available. A waveform may be a composition of some prominent, overlapped and weak return pulses. A waveform decomposition method may easily detect a prominent return pulse, but it usually has some difficulties to deal with overlapped and weak pulses. In this paper, a waveform fitting method which takes the overlapped pulses into consideration will be applied. To fit a waveform, the number of returns is needed. The initial number of returns commonly is determined by a simple way such as the number of local maximum of a waveform which is influenced by noises and overlapped echoes. For this reason, the wavelet transform is used to estimate the initial number of returns in this research. Moreover, compared with taking Gaussian as the fitting basic model, another basic model, log-normal is included. Our preliminary results show the effectiveness of wavelet transform to determine the initial number and the ability to detect overlapped pulses. The Log-normal model has better fitting results than Gaussian model in forest areas. As the results, the points extracted by our developed methods increase compared with the points extracted by commercial system. The increased points can be useful to future applications especially in a forest area.",
author = "Wang, {Cheng Kai} and Chi-Kuei Wang and Yi-Hsing Tseng",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781618394972",
series = "32nd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2011, ACRS 2011",
pages = "449--454",
booktitle = "32nd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2011, ACRS 2011",

}

Wang, CK, Wang, C-K & Tseng, Y-H 2011, A comparison of LIDAR waeveform decomposition models. in 32nd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2011, ACRS 2011. 32nd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2011, ACRS 2011, vol. 1, pp. 449-454, 32nd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2011, ACRS 2011, Tapei, Taiwan, 11-10-03.

A comparison of LIDAR waeveform decomposition models. / Wang, Cheng Kai; Wang, Chi-Kuei; Tseng, Yi-Hsing.

32nd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2011, ACRS 2011. 2011. p. 449-454 (32nd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2011, ACRS 2011; Vol. 1).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - A comparison of LIDAR waeveform decomposition models

AU - Wang, Cheng Kai

AU - Wang, Chi-Kuei

AU - Tseng, Yi-Hsing

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - The storage capability of full waveform is the state-of-the-art technology of LIDAR. In addition to the 3D point information recorded by conventional LIDAR systems, waveform LIDAR systems encode the intensity of returned signal along the time domain. This provides a user the possibility to decompose the waveform for the detection of illuminated target points. Therefore, the locations of the illuminated targets can be refined by analyzing the waveform data. So far, a standard approach to waveform decomposition is still not available. A waveform may be a composition of some prominent, overlapped and weak return pulses. A waveform decomposition method may easily detect a prominent return pulse, but it usually has some difficulties to deal with overlapped and weak pulses. In this paper, a waveform fitting method which takes the overlapped pulses into consideration will be applied. To fit a waveform, the number of returns is needed. The initial number of returns commonly is determined by a simple way such as the number of local maximum of a waveform which is influenced by noises and overlapped echoes. For this reason, the wavelet transform is used to estimate the initial number of returns in this research. Moreover, compared with taking Gaussian as the fitting basic model, another basic model, log-normal is included. Our preliminary results show the effectiveness of wavelet transform to determine the initial number and the ability to detect overlapped pulses. The Log-normal model has better fitting results than Gaussian model in forest areas. As the results, the points extracted by our developed methods increase compared with the points extracted by commercial system. The increased points can be useful to future applications especially in a forest area.

AB - The storage capability of full waveform is the state-of-the-art technology of LIDAR. In addition to the 3D point information recorded by conventional LIDAR systems, waveform LIDAR systems encode the intensity of returned signal along the time domain. This provides a user the possibility to decompose the waveform for the detection of illuminated target points. Therefore, the locations of the illuminated targets can be refined by analyzing the waveform data. So far, a standard approach to waveform decomposition is still not available. A waveform may be a composition of some prominent, overlapped and weak return pulses. A waveform decomposition method may easily detect a prominent return pulse, but it usually has some difficulties to deal with overlapped and weak pulses. In this paper, a waveform fitting method which takes the overlapped pulses into consideration will be applied. To fit a waveform, the number of returns is needed. The initial number of returns commonly is determined by a simple way such as the number of local maximum of a waveform which is influenced by noises and overlapped echoes. For this reason, the wavelet transform is used to estimate the initial number of returns in this research. Moreover, compared with taking Gaussian as the fitting basic model, another basic model, log-normal is included. Our preliminary results show the effectiveness of wavelet transform to determine the initial number and the ability to detect overlapped pulses. The Log-normal model has better fitting results than Gaussian model in forest areas. As the results, the points extracted by our developed methods increase compared with the points extracted by commercial system. The increased points can be useful to future applications especially in a forest area.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865699413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865699413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781618394972

T3 - 32nd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2011, ACRS 2011

SP - 449

EP - 454

BT - 32nd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2011, ACRS 2011

ER -

Wang CK, Wang C-K, Tseng Y-H. A comparison of LIDAR waeveform decomposition models. In 32nd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2011, ACRS 2011. 2011. p. 449-454. (32nd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2011, ACRS 2011).