A dynamic taxonomy for managing knowledge assets

Sheng-Tun Li, Ming Hong Tsai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the last decade, knowledge asset management has attracted great attention in both academia and in business. Many researchers have used various perspectives to propose taxonomies for classifying knowledge assets. As knowledge assets never change their type once they have been classified, we argue that these taxonomies should be regarded as "static". This is mainly because existing taxonomies classify knowledge assets by their peculiarities rather than by their environmental factors. Unlike previous studies, this study proposes a "dynamic" taxonomy, using two dimensions: "impacts on sustainability of competitive advantage (SCA)" and "impacts on appropriability". This classifies a firm's knowledge assets into four types: core knowledge assets, dynamic knowledge assets, supportive knowledge assets and low-value knowledge assets. The proposed taxonomy possesses two main characteristics: one is of it being dynamic and the other is its alignment with strategy. To elaborate this taxonomy, several examples related to the four types of knowledge assets are presented and several propositions are introduced in this study.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)284-298
Number of pages15
JournalTechnovation
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Apr 1

Fingerprint

Taxonomies
Asset management
Knowledge management
Taxonomy
Knowledge assets
Sustainable development
Industry

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Engineering(all)
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Li, Sheng-Tun ; Tsai, Ming Hong. / A dynamic taxonomy for managing knowledge assets. In: Technovation. 2009 ; Vol. 29, No. 4. pp. 284-298.
@article{4a96b01490b14389810d107027890170,
title = "A dynamic taxonomy for managing knowledge assets",
abstract = "In the last decade, knowledge asset management has attracted great attention in both academia and in business. Many researchers have used various perspectives to propose taxonomies for classifying knowledge assets. As knowledge assets never change their type once they have been classified, we argue that these taxonomies should be regarded as {"}static{"}. This is mainly because existing taxonomies classify knowledge assets by their peculiarities rather than by their environmental factors. Unlike previous studies, this study proposes a {"}dynamic{"} taxonomy, using two dimensions: {"}impacts on sustainability of competitive advantage (SCA){"} and {"}impacts on appropriability{"}. This classifies a firm's knowledge assets into four types: core knowledge assets, dynamic knowledge assets, supportive knowledge assets and low-value knowledge assets. The proposed taxonomy possesses two main characteristics: one is of it being dynamic and the other is its alignment with strategy. To elaborate this taxonomy, several examples related to the four types of knowledge assets are presented and several propositions are introduced in this study.",
author = "Sheng-Tun Li and Tsai, {Ming Hong}",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.002",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "284--298",
journal = "Technovation",
issn = "0166-4972",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

A dynamic taxonomy for managing knowledge assets. / Li, Sheng-Tun; Tsai, Ming Hong.

In: Technovation, Vol. 29, No. 4, 01.04.2009, p. 284-298.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A dynamic taxonomy for managing knowledge assets

AU - Li, Sheng-Tun

AU - Tsai, Ming Hong

PY - 2009/4/1

Y1 - 2009/4/1

N2 - In the last decade, knowledge asset management has attracted great attention in both academia and in business. Many researchers have used various perspectives to propose taxonomies for classifying knowledge assets. As knowledge assets never change their type once they have been classified, we argue that these taxonomies should be regarded as "static". This is mainly because existing taxonomies classify knowledge assets by their peculiarities rather than by their environmental factors. Unlike previous studies, this study proposes a "dynamic" taxonomy, using two dimensions: "impacts on sustainability of competitive advantage (SCA)" and "impacts on appropriability". This classifies a firm's knowledge assets into four types: core knowledge assets, dynamic knowledge assets, supportive knowledge assets and low-value knowledge assets. The proposed taxonomy possesses two main characteristics: one is of it being dynamic and the other is its alignment with strategy. To elaborate this taxonomy, several examples related to the four types of knowledge assets are presented and several propositions are introduced in this study.

AB - In the last decade, knowledge asset management has attracted great attention in both academia and in business. Many researchers have used various perspectives to propose taxonomies for classifying knowledge assets. As knowledge assets never change their type once they have been classified, we argue that these taxonomies should be regarded as "static". This is mainly because existing taxonomies classify knowledge assets by their peculiarities rather than by their environmental factors. Unlike previous studies, this study proposes a "dynamic" taxonomy, using two dimensions: "impacts on sustainability of competitive advantage (SCA)" and "impacts on appropriability". This classifies a firm's knowledge assets into four types: core knowledge assets, dynamic knowledge assets, supportive knowledge assets and low-value knowledge assets. The proposed taxonomy possesses two main characteristics: one is of it being dynamic and the other is its alignment with strategy. To elaborate this taxonomy, several examples related to the four types of knowledge assets are presented and several propositions are introduced in this study.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61449154637&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=61449154637&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.002

DO - 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:61449154637

VL - 29

SP - 284

EP - 298

JO - Technovation

JF - Technovation

SN - 0166-4972

IS - 4

ER -