A modified procedure for synthesising ratio judgements in the analytic hierarchy process

J. M. Yeh, Chinho Lin, B. Kreng, J. Y. Gee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has been widely applied to solve problems arising in group decision making, by synthesising different or conflicting judgements. However, directly synthesising conflicting judgements by calculating the geometric mean of preference weights (ratios) in AHP may not reach consensus from all members in a decision making group, especially, when those members represent the stakeholders of the decision making problem. This study proposes a new method that uses the genetic algorithm and utility function to synthesise preference weights to prevent this fallacy occurring when implementing the classical AHP approach. Using the proposed method, the final decision can be achieved with only minimally-adjusted preference weights.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)867-873
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the Operational Research Society
Volume50
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1999 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Analytic hierarchy process
Decision making
Genetic algorithms
Group decision making

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Management Information Systems
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Marketing

Cite this

@article{e7ad4316d7094eecbc86c8e90356350d,
title = "A modified procedure for synthesising ratio judgements in the analytic hierarchy process",
abstract = "The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has been widely applied to solve problems arising in group decision making, by synthesising different or conflicting judgements. However, directly synthesising conflicting judgements by calculating the geometric mean of preference weights (ratios) in AHP may not reach consensus from all members in a decision making group, especially, when those members represent the stakeholders of the decision making problem. This study proposes a new method that uses the genetic algorithm and utility function to synthesise preference weights to prevent this fallacy occurring when implementing the classical AHP approach. Using the proposed method, the final decision can be achieved with only minimally-adjusted preference weights.",
author = "Yeh, {J. M.} and Chinho Lin and B. Kreng and Gee, {J. Y.}",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600768",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "867--873",
journal = "Journal of the Operational Research Society",
issn = "0160-5682",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
number = "8",

}

A modified procedure for synthesising ratio judgements in the analytic hierarchy process. / Yeh, J. M.; Lin, Chinho; Kreng, B.; Gee, J. Y.

In: Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 50, No. 8, 01.01.1999, p. 867-873.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A modified procedure for synthesising ratio judgements in the analytic hierarchy process

AU - Yeh, J. M.

AU - Lin, Chinho

AU - Kreng, B.

AU - Gee, J. Y.

PY - 1999/1/1

Y1 - 1999/1/1

N2 - The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has been widely applied to solve problems arising in group decision making, by synthesising different or conflicting judgements. However, directly synthesising conflicting judgements by calculating the geometric mean of preference weights (ratios) in AHP may not reach consensus from all members in a decision making group, especially, when those members represent the stakeholders of the decision making problem. This study proposes a new method that uses the genetic algorithm and utility function to synthesise preference weights to prevent this fallacy occurring when implementing the classical AHP approach. Using the proposed method, the final decision can be achieved with only minimally-adjusted preference weights.

AB - The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has been widely applied to solve problems arising in group decision making, by synthesising different or conflicting judgements. However, directly synthesising conflicting judgements by calculating the geometric mean of preference weights (ratios) in AHP may not reach consensus from all members in a decision making group, especially, when those members represent the stakeholders of the decision making problem. This study proposes a new method that uses the genetic algorithm and utility function to synthesise preference weights to prevent this fallacy occurring when implementing the classical AHP approach. Using the proposed method, the final decision can be achieved with only minimally-adjusted preference weights.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033241757&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033241757&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600768

DO - 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600768

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 867

EP - 873

JO - Journal of the Operational Research Society

JF - Journal of the Operational Research Society

SN - 0160-5682

IS - 8

ER -