A modified procedure for synthesising ratio judgements in the analytic hierarchy process

J. M. Yeh, C. Lin, B. Kreng, J. Y. Gee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has been widely applied to solve problems arising in group decision making, by synthesising different or conflicting judgements. However, directly synthesising conflicting judgements by calculating the geometric mean of preference weights (ratios) in AHP may not reach consensus from all members in a decision making group, especially, when those members represent the stakeholders of the decision making problem. This study proposes a new method that uses the genetic algorithm and utility function to synthesise preference weights to prevent this fallacy occurring when implementing the classical AHP approach. Using the proposed method, the final decision can be achieved with only minimally-adjusted preference weights.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)867-873
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the Operational Research Society
Volume50
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1999 Jan 1

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Management Information Systems
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Marketing

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A modified procedure for synthesising ratio judgements in the analytic hierarchy process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this