TY - JOUR
T1 - A multicenter phase II study of biweekly capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer
AU - Chao, Yee
AU - Hsieh, Jan Sing
AU - Yeh, Hsien Tang
AU - Su, Yu Chieh
AU - Wu, Cheng Chung
AU - Chen, Jen Shi
AU - Tai, Cheng Jeng
AU - Bai, Li Yuan
AU - Yeh, Kun Huei
AU - Su, Wu Chou
AU - Li, Chung Pin
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments this work was supported by F. Hoffmann-la roche ltd. and grants from the taipei Veterans general Hospital (V101C-178), the national Science Council (nSC 98-2314-B-075-029), and the national research Program for Biopharmaceutics of taiwan (100Ct202).
PY - 2014/4
Y1 - 2014/4
N2 - Purpose: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of biweekly capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin in previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. Methods: Patients received oral capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-10 plus oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 as a 2-h intravenous infusion on day 1, every 2 weeks (XELOX). The primary endpoint was overall response rate. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity. Results: From March 2007 to October 2010, 46 patients were enrolled in this phase II study. The median age was 64 years (range 32-85). A total of 391 (median 7.5, range 1-29) cycles were delivered. Among the 41 patients evaluable for tumor response, 9 showed partial response and 25 had stable disease. The overall response rates of the evaluable and intent-to-treat (ITT) populations were 22 % (95 % CI 10-42 %) and 20 % (95 % CI 9-34 %), respectively. In the ITT analysis, the progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.6 months (95 % CI 4.1-6.3 months) and 8.0 months (95 % CI 6.3-10.1 months), respectively. The most common hematological toxicities were thrombocytopenia (35 %) and leucopenia (34 %), whereas the most common non-hematological toxicities were neuropathy (35 %), fatigue (33 %), diarrhea (27 %), vomiting (26 %), and hand-foot syndrome (25 %). Major grade 3-4 toxicities were anemia (11 %), diarrhea (9 %), and hand-foot syndrome (7 %). No patient died of treatment-related toxicities. Conclusions: Although the biweekly XELOX regimen failed its primary response rate endpoint, it showed modest efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.
AB - Purpose: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of biweekly capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin in previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. Methods: Patients received oral capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-10 plus oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 as a 2-h intravenous infusion on day 1, every 2 weeks (XELOX). The primary endpoint was overall response rate. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity. Results: From March 2007 to October 2010, 46 patients were enrolled in this phase II study. The median age was 64 years (range 32-85). A total of 391 (median 7.5, range 1-29) cycles were delivered. Among the 41 patients evaluable for tumor response, 9 showed partial response and 25 had stable disease. The overall response rates of the evaluable and intent-to-treat (ITT) populations were 22 % (95 % CI 10-42 %) and 20 % (95 % CI 9-34 %), respectively. In the ITT analysis, the progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.6 months (95 % CI 4.1-6.3 months) and 8.0 months (95 % CI 6.3-10.1 months), respectively. The most common hematological toxicities were thrombocytopenia (35 %) and leucopenia (34 %), whereas the most common non-hematological toxicities were neuropathy (35 %), fatigue (33 %), diarrhea (27 %), vomiting (26 %), and hand-foot syndrome (25 %). Major grade 3-4 toxicities were anemia (11 %), diarrhea (9 %), and hand-foot syndrome (7 %). No patient died of treatment-related toxicities. Conclusions: Although the biweekly XELOX regimen failed its primary response rate endpoint, it showed modest efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898058566&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898058566&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00280-014-2407-y
DO - 10.1007/s00280-014-2407-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 24531611
AN - SCOPUS:84898058566
SN - 0344-5704
VL - 73
SP - 799
EP - 806
JO - Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
JF - Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
IS - 4
ER -