TY - JOUR
T1 - Accuracy of computerized automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks
AU - Liu, Jia Kuang
AU - Chen, Yen Ting
AU - Cheng, Kuo Sheng
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by grants NSC 80-0404-E-006-52, NSC 83-0412-B-006-076 & NSC 84-2331-B-006-009 from the National Science Council, Taiwan, ROC.
PY - 2000/11
Y1 - 2000/11
N2 - Computerized cephalometric analysis can include both landmark identification and determination of linear or angular measurements. Although its use is time saving compared with a manual method, the accuracy of automatic landmark identification remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a computerized automatic landmark identification system that used an edge-based technique. The technique divides the scanned cephalogram into 8 rectangular subimage regions. After the resolution of these subimages is reduced, the edges are detected and the landmarks are located automatically. Thirteen landmarks were selected for assessment on a set of 10 test cephalograms. The results showed that the errors between manual and computerized identification for landmarks were not significantly different (P > .05) for 5 of 13 landmarks: sella, nasion, porion, orbitale, and gnathion. These results suggest that the accuracy of computerized automatic identification is acceptable for certain landmarks only. Further studies to improve the accuracy of computerized automated landmark identification are needed.
AB - Computerized cephalometric analysis can include both landmark identification and determination of linear or angular measurements. Although its use is time saving compared with a manual method, the accuracy of automatic landmark identification remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a computerized automatic landmark identification system that used an edge-based technique. The technique divides the scanned cephalogram into 8 rectangular subimage regions. After the resolution of these subimages is reduced, the edges are detected and the landmarks are located automatically. Thirteen landmarks were selected for assessment on a set of 10 test cephalograms. The results showed that the errors between manual and computerized identification for landmarks were not significantly different (P > .05) for 5 of 13 landmarks: sella, nasion, porion, orbitale, and gnathion. These results suggest that the accuracy of computerized automatic identification is acceptable for certain landmarks only. Further studies to improve the accuracy of computerized automated landmark identification are needed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034320390&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034320390&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1067/mod.2000.110168
DO - 10.1067/mod.2000.110168
M3 - Article
C2 - 11094367
AN - SCOPUS:0034320390
SN - 0889-5406
VL - 118
SP - 535
EP - 540
JO - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
JF - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
IS - 5
ER -