TY - JOUR
T1 - Adjuvant bupivacaine scalp block facilitates stabilization of hemodynamics in patients undergoing craniotomy with general anesthesia
T2 - a preliminary report
AU - Lee, E. Jian
AU - Lee, Ming Yang
AU - Shyr, Ming Hwang
AU - Cheng, Juei Tang
AU - Toung, Thomas J.K.
AU - Mirski, Marek A.
AU - Chen, Tsung Ying
PY - 2006/11
Y1 - 2006/11
N2 - Study Objective: To evaluate the effect of 0.25% bupivacaine scalp block on alterations in hemodynamics and plasma catecholamine metabolites during general anesthesia in patients undergoing frontotemporal craniotomy. Design: Prospective, clinical study. Setting: Operating room of a university hospital. Patients: 16 ASA physical status II and III patients who were scheduled for frontotemporal craniotomy. Interventions: Patients were prospectively randomized to receive a saline control (C group) or bupivacaine scalp block (SB group) as an adjuvant to general anesthesia using isoflurane in 50% N2O-O2. Measurements: Routine monitoring of electrocardiogram, heart rate (HR), and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were recorded at two-minute intervals from the beginning of anesthesia until 10 minutes after incision, followed by 5-minute intervals throughout the remaining course of the surgery. By prospective design, increases in MAP or HR by 20% above the mean baseline values were treated with 2.5 mg/kg of thiopental combined with 2 μg/kg of fentanyl. Arterial blood was sampled at 5 minutes before and after skin incision and at the start of dural opening for measuring serum catecholamine metabolites by high-performance liquid chromatography. Main Results: Only two patients in the SB group needed additional anesthetics for stabilizing their hemodynamics during the course of anesthesia. In contrast, all C group patients required supplemental anesthesia for controlling the abrupt rise in hemodynamic parameters. In addition, absolute MAP and HR values were significantly higher in the C group than in the SB group during the surgical period between incision and dural opening. The differences in hemodynamics observed between the two groups were, however, not accompanied with a significant change in plasma catecholamine metabolites at each predetermined time interval measured. Conclusions: Pretreatment with 0.25% bupivacaine scalp block appeared to be an effective adjuvant treatment for maintaining stable hemodynamics for patients undergoing craniotomy during general anesthesia especially at the time of skin incision and dural opening. This study design was unable to discern any correlation between elevation in hemodynamic parameters and a rise in serum catecholamine levels.
AB - Study Objective: To evaluate the effect of 0.25% bupivacaine scalp block on alterations in hemodynamics and plasma catecholamine metabolites during general anesthesia in patients undergoing frontotemporal craniotomy. Design: Prospective, clinical study. Setting: Operating room of a university hospital. Patients: 16 ASA physical status II and III patients who were scheduled for frontotemporal craniotomy. Interventions: Patients were prospectively randomized to receive a saline control (C group) or bupivacaine scalp block (SB group) as an adjuvant to general anesthesia using isoflurane in 50% N2O-O2. Measurements: Routine monitoring of electrocardiogram, heart rate (HR), and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were recorded at two-minute intervals from the beginning of anesthesia until 10 minutes after incision, followed by 5-minute intervals throughout the remaining course of the surgery. By prospective design, increases in MAP or HR by 20% above the mean baseline values were treated with 2.5 mg/kg of thiopental combined with 2 μg/kg of fentanyl. Arterial blood was sampled at 5 minutes before and after skin incision and at the start of dural opening for measuring serum catecholamine metabolites by high-performance liquid chromatography. Main Results: Only two patients in the SB group needed additional anesthetics for stabilizing their hemodynamics during the course of anesthesia. In contrast, all C group patients required supplemental anesthesia for controlling the abrupt rise in hemodynamic parameters. In addition, absolute MAP and HR values were significantly higher in the C group than in the SB group during the surgical period between incision and dural opening. The differences in hemodynamics observed between the two groups were, however, not accompanied with a significant change in plasma catecholamine metabolites at each predetermined time interval measured. Conclusions: Pretreatment with 0.25% bupivacaine scalp block appeared to be an effective adjuvant treatment for maintaining stable hemodynamics for patients undergoing craniotomy during general anesthesia especially at the time of skin incision and dural opening. This study design was unable to discern any correlation between elevation in hemodynamic parameters and a rise in serum catecholamine levels.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/33751298736
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/33751298736#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinane.2006.02.014
DO - 10.1016/j.jclinane.2006.02.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 17126775
AN - SCOPUS:33751298736
SN - 0952-8180
VL - 18
SP - 490
EP - 494
JO - Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
JF - Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
IS - 7
ER -