Alterations in Respiratory Mechanics in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Following Bronchoalveolar Lavage

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Purpose: Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) can be used for a variety of diagnostic purposes in mechanically ventilated patients. BAL can cause changes in respiratory mechanics. However, the risk factors associated with these changes remain unknown. The current study tried to identify the risk factors that contribute to changes in respiratory mechanics following BAL. Methods: Changes in respiratory mechanics were assessed in 56 mechanically ventilated patients who received BAL using an interrupter method under constant flow. Results: Intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi) was correlated significantly with changes in respiratory system resistance and compliance following BAL in mechanically ventilated patients (p = 0.003). In 14 patients with PEEPi > 1 cmH2O, maximal resistance (Rmax) before BAL was 22.5 ± 5.9 cmH2O/L/S, increasing to 31.6 ± 8.5 cmH2O/L/S immediately after BAL, and remaining high (28.4 ± 7.5 cmH2O/L/S) 30 minutes later (p < 0.001). Increase in minimal resistance (Rmin), delta resistance (ΔR), and decrease in compliance followed the same time trend. In 42 patients with PEEPi £ 1 cmH2O, Rmax before BAL was 15.5 ± 3.5 cmH2O/L/S, increasing to 17.6 ± 4.6 cmH2O/L/S immediately after BAL, and decreasing to 16.6 ± 4.3 cmH2O/L/S (p < 0.001) 30 minutes later. Increase in Rmin, ΔR and decrease in compliance were similar to those seen with Rmax. Increases in Rmax, Rmin and ΔR, and decrease in compliance following BAL were significantly higher in patients with significant PEEPi than in those without throughout the recording period (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Patients with significant PEEPi experienced greater changes in respiratory mechanics than those without. Physicians should be cautious when performing BAL in such patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)704-712
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the Formosan Medical Association
Volume108
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Sep 1

Fingerprint

Respiratory Mechanics
Bronchoalveolar Lavage
Positive-Pressure Respiration
Compliance
Respiratory System

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{83272b72841b4209b29190dfb21e4409,
title = "Alterations in Respiratory Mechanics in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Following Bronchoalveolar Lavage",
abstract = "Background/Purpose: Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) can be used for a variety of diagnostic purposes in mechanically ventilated patients. BAL can cause changes in respiratory mechanics. However, the risk factors associated with these changes remain unknown. The current study tried to identify the risk factors that contribute to changes in respiratory mechanics following BAL. Methods: Changes in respiratory mechanics were assessed in 56 mechanically ventilated patients who received BAL using an interrupter method under constant flow. Results: Intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi) was correlated significantly with changes in respiratory system resistance and compliance following BAL in mechanically ventilated patients (p = 0.003). In 14 patients with PEEPi > 1 cmH2O, maximal resistance (Rmax) before BAL was 22.5 ± 5.9 cmH2O/L/S, increasing to 31.6 ± 8.5 cmH2O/L/S immediately after BAL, and remaining high (28.4 ± 7.5 cmH2O/L/S) 30 minutes later (p < 0.001). Increase in minimal resistance (Rmin), delta resistance (ΔR), and decrease in compliance followed the same time trend. In 42 patients with PEEPi £ 1 cmH2O, Rmax before BAL was 15.5 ± 3.5 cmH2O/L/S, increasing to 17.6 ± 4.6 cmH2O/L/S immediately after BAL, and decreasing to 16.6 ± 4.3 cmH2O/L/S (p < 0.001) 30 minutes later. Increase in Rmin, ΔR and decrease in compliance were similar to those seen with Rmax. Increases in Rmax, Rmin and ΔR, and decrease in compliance following BAL were significantly higher in patients with significant PEEPi than in those without throughout the recording period (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Patients with significant PEEPi experienced greater changes in respiratory mechanics than those without. Physicians should be cautious when performing BAL in such patients.",
author = "Chou, {Meng Yi} and Chih-Ying Ou and Chang-Wen Chen",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0929-6646(09)60393-4",
language = "English",
volume = "108",
pages = "704--712",
journal = "Journal of the Formosan Medical Association",
issn = "0929-6646",
publisher = "Excerpta Medica Asia Ltd.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Alterations in Respiratory Mechanics in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Following Bronchoalveolar Lavage

AU - Chou, Meng Yi

AU - Ou, Chih-Ying

AU - Chen, Chang-Wen

PY - 2009/9/1

Y1 - 2009/9/1

N2 - Background/Purpose: Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) can be used for a variety of diagnostic purposes in mechanically ventilated patients. BAL can cause changes in respiratory mechanics. However, the risk factors associated with these changes remain unknown. The current study tried to identify the risk factors that contribute to changes in respiratory mechanics following BAL. Methods: Changes in respiratory mechanics were assessed in 56 mechanically ventilated patients who received BAL using an interrupter method under constant flow. Results: Intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi) was correlated significantly with changes in respiratory system resistance and compliance following BAL in mechanically ventilated patients (p = 0.003). In 14 patients with PEEPi > 1 cmH2O, maximal resistance (Rmax) before BAL was 22.5 ± 5.9 cmH2O/L/S, increasing to 31.6 ± 8.5 cmH2O/L/S immediately after BAL, and remaining high (28.4 ± 7.5 cmH2O/L/S) 30 minutes later (p < 0.001). Increase in minimal resistance (Rmin), delta resistance (ΔR), and decrease in compliance followed the same time trend. In 42 patients with PEEPi £ 1 cmH2O, Rmax before BAL was 15.5 ± 3.5 cmH2O/L/S, increasing to 17.6 ± 4.6 cmH2O/L/S immediately after BAL, and decreasing to 16.6 ± 4.3 cmH2O/L/S (p < 0.001) 30 minutes later. Increase in Rmin, ΔR and decrease in compliance were similar to those seen with Rmax. Increases in Rmax, Rmin and ΔR, and decrease in compliance following BAL were significantly higher in patients with significant PEEPi than in those without throughout the recording period (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Patients with significant PEEPi experienced greater changes in respiratory mechanics than those without. Physicians should be cautious when performing BAL in such patients.

AB - Background/Purpose: Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) can be used for a variety of diagnostic purposes in mechanically ventilated patients. BAL can cause changes in respiratory mechanics. However, the risk factors associated with these changes remain unknown. The current study tried to identify the risk factors that contribute to changes in respiratory mechanics following BAL. Methods: Changes in respiratory mechanics were assessed in 56 mechanically ventilated patients who received BAL using an interrupter method under constant flow. Results: Intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi) was correlated significantly with changes in respiratory system resistance and compliance following BAL in mechanically ventilated patients (p = 0.003). In 14 patients with PEEPi > 1 cmH2O, maximal resistance (Rmax) before BAL was 22.5 ± 5.9 cmH2O/L/S, increasing to 31.6 ± 8.5 cmH2O/L/S immediately after BAL, and remaining high (28.4 ± 7.5 cmH2O/L/S) 30 minutes later (p < 0.001). Increase in minimal resistance (Rmin), delta resistance (ΔR), and decrease in compliance followed the same time trend. In 42 patients with PEEPi £ 1 cmH2O, Rmax before BAL was 15.5 ± 3.5 cmH2O/L/S, increasing to 17.6 ± 4.6 cmH2O/L/S immediately after BAL, and decreasing to 16.6 ± 4.3 cmH2O/L/S (p < 0.001) 30 minutes later. Increase in Rmin, ΔR and decrease in compliance were similar to those seen with Rmax. Increases in Rmax, Rmin and ΔR, and decrease in compliance following BAL were significantly higher in patients with significant PEEPi than in those without throughout the recording period (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Patients with significant PEEPi experienced greater changes in respiratory mechanics than those without. Physicians should be cautious when performing BAL in such patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=71549171888&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=71549171888&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0929-6646(09)60393-4

DO - 10.1016/S0929-6646(09)60393-4

M3 - Article

VL - 108

SP - 704

EP - 712

JO - Journal of the Formosan Medical Association

JF - Journal of the Formosan Medical Association

SN - 0929-6646

IS - 9

ER -