An assessment of user needs for intelligent living space

Jia Yih Chen; Yu Pin Ma; Taysheng Jeng; Chen Chi Chang

doi:10.3763/inbi.2009.0031

An assessment of user needs for intelligent living space

Jia Yih Chen, Yu Pin Ma, Taysheng Jeng, Chen Chi Chang

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this study is to facilitate the design of intelligent space based on our assessment of user needs. The acceptance of smart living technologies is a challenging issue, yet to be proven. In this study, a hypothetical model is proposed on the basis of the hedonic technology acceptance model, and is exemplified by the Living 3.0 Demo Center. Safety, health, sustainability, convenience are the four factors modelled. The findings from a questionnaire and data analysed by structural equation modelling demonstrate that technologies for safety are significantly perceived as being 'useful', whereas the applications for convenience are significantly perceived as being 'enjoyable'.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	20-40
Number of pages	21
Journal	Intelligent Buildings International
Volume	2
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3763/inbi.2009.0031
Publication status	Published - 2010 Dec 1

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Building and Construction
Computer Science Applications

Access to Document

10.3763/inbi.2009.0031

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'An assessment of user needs for intelligent living space'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{37058cec91734f6ebe49357b73764c72,

title = "An assessment of user needs for intelligent living space",

abstract = "The objective of this study is to facilitate the design of intelligent space based on our assessment of user needs. The acceptance of smart living technologies is a challenging issue, yet to be proven. In this study, a hypothetical model is proposed on the basis of the hedonic technology acceptance model, and is exemplified by the Living 3.0 Demo Center. Safety, health, sustainability, convenience are the four factors modelled. The findings from a questionnaire and data analysed by structural equation modelling demonstrate that technologies for safety are significantly perceived as being 'useful', whereas the applications for convenience are significantly perceived as being 'enjoyable'.",

author = "Chen, {Jia Yih} and Ma, {Yu Pin} and Taysheng Jeng and Chang, {Chen Chi}",

year = "2010",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.3763/inbi.2009.0031",

language = "English",

volume = "2",

pages = "20--40",

journal = "Intelligent Buildings International",

issn = "1750-8975",

publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An assessment of user needs for intelligent living space

AU - Chen, Jia Yih

AU - Ma, Yu Pin

AU - Jeng, Taysheng

AU - Chang, Chen Chi

PY - 2010/12/1

Y1 - 2010/12/1

N2 - The objective of this study is to facilitate the design of intelligent space based on our assessment of user needs. The acceptance of smart living technologies is a challenging issue, yet to be proven. In this study, a hypothetical model is proposed on the basis of the hedonic technology acceptance model, and is exemplified by the Living 3.0 Demo Center. Safety, health, sustainability, convenience are the four factors modelled. The findings from a questionnaire and data analysed by structural equation modelling demonstrate that technologies for safety are significantly perceived as being 'useful', whereas the applications for convenience are significantly perceived as being 'enjoyable'.

AB - The objective of this study is to facilitate the design of intelligent space based on our assessment of user needs. The acceptance of smart living technologies is a challenging issue, yet to be proven. In this study, a hypothetical model is proposed on the basis of the hedonic technology acceptance model, and is exemplified by the Living 3.0 Demo Center. Safety, health, sustainability, convenience are the four factors modelled. The findings from a questionnaire and data analysed by structural equation modelling demonstrate that technologies for safety are significantly perceived as being 'useful', whereas the applications for convenience are significantly perceived as being 'enjoyable'.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79954516708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79954516708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3763/inbi.2009.0031

DO - 10.3763/inbi.2009.0031

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79954516708

VL - 2

SP - 20

EP - 40

JO - Intelligent Buildings International

JF - Intelligent Buildings International

SN - 1750-8975

IS - 1

ER -