An empirical comparison of the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ among patients with COPD

Wen Miin Liang, Jian Jung Chen, Chih Hung Chang, Hung Wei Chen, Shiah Lian Chen, Liang Wen Hang, Jung Der Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: To compare the psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) instrument and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and to examine the association between pulmonary function and domains and items of these questionnaires in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: The WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ were administered to 211 patients. The reliability and validity of, and correlations among, the domain scores were examined. Multiple regression analyses were performed to identify which items were independently associated with subjects' lung functions. Results: Both questionnaires showed good internal consistency (α > 0.8), except the SGRQ symptoms domain (α = 0.66), minimal ceiling and floor effects, and good item convergent and item discriminant validity. There were moderate correlations between physical domain of the WHOQOL-BREF and activity, impacts and total domains of the SGRQ, and between psychological domain of the WHOQOL-BREF and impacts and total domains of the SGRQ. Eighteen items were significantly associated with lung function, particularly those items relating to mobility/walking and activities of daily living (ADL). Conclusion: Both the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ showed comparable reliability and validity. Items related to mobility/walking and ADL may be useful in clinical screening for lung function impairment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)793-800
Number of pages8
JournalQuality of Life Research
Volume17
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Jun 1

Fingerprint

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Quality of Life
Lung
Activities of Daily Living
Reproducibility of Results
Walking
Surveys and Questionnaires
Psychometrics
Regression Analysis
Psychology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Liang, W. M., Chen, J. J., Chang, C. H., Chen, H. W., Chen, S. L., Hang, L. W., & Wang, J. D. (2008). An empirical comparison of the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ among patients with COPD. Quality of Life Research, 17(5), 793-800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9326-5
Liang, Wen Miin ; Chen, Jian Jung ; Chang, Chih Hung ; Chen, Hung Wei ; Chen, Shiah Lian ; Hang, Liang Wen ; Wang, Jung Der. / An empirical comparison of the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ among patients with COPD. In: Quality of Life Research. 2008 ; Vol. 17, No. 5. pp. 793-800.
@article{80f205bf52ab44cf88d7907a13bcd209,
title = "An empirical comparison of the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ among patients with COPD",
abstract = "Aims: To compare the psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) instrument and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and to examine the association between pulmonary function and domains and items of these questionnaires in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: The WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ were administered to 211 patients. The reliability and validity of, and correlations among, the domain scores were examined. Multiple regression analyses were performed to identify which items were independently associated with subjects' lung functions. Results: Both questionnaires showed good internal consistency (α > 0.8), except the SGRQ symptoms domain (α = 0.66), minimal ceiling and floor effects, and good item convergent and item discriminant validity. There were moderate correlations between physical domain of the WHOQOL-BREF and activity, impacts and total domains of the SGRQ, and between psychological domain of the WHOQOL-BREF and impacts and total domains of the SGRQ. Eighteen items were significantly associated with lung function, particularly those items relating to mobility/walking and activities of daily living (ADL). Conclusion: Both the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ showed comparable reliability and validity. Items related to mobility/walking and ADL may be useful in clinical screening for lung function impairment.",
author = "Liang, {Wen Miin} and Chen, {Jian Jung} and Chang, {Chih Hung} and Chen, {Hung Wei} and Chen, {Shiah Lian} and Hang, {Liang Wen} and Wang, {Jung Der}",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11136-008-9326-5",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "793--800",
journal = "Quality of Life Research",
issn = "0962-9343",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "5",

}

An empirical comparison of the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ among patients with COPD. / Liang, Wen Miin; Chen, Jian Jung; Chang, Chih Hung; Chen, Hung Wei; Chen, Shiah Lian; Hang, Liang Wen; Wang, Jung Der.

In: Quality of Life Research, Vol. 17, No. 5, 01.06.2008, p. 793-800.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An empirical comparison of the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ among patients with COPD

AU - Liang, Wen Miin

AU - Chen, Jian Jung

AU - Chang, Chih Hung

AU - Chen, Hung Wei

AU - Chen, Shiah Lian

AU - Hang, Liang Wen

AU - Wang, Jung Der

PY - 2008/6/1

Y1 - 2008/6/1

N2 - Aims: To compare the psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) instrument and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and to examine the association between pulmonary function and domains and items of these questionnaires in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: The WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ were administered to 211 patients. The reliability and validity of, and correlations among, the domain scores were examined. Multiple regression analyses were performed to identify which items were independently associated with subjects' lung functions. Results: Both questionnaires showed good internal consistency (α > 0.8), except the SGRQ symptoms domain (α = 0.66), minimal ceiling and floor effects, and good item convergent and item discriminant validity. There were moderate correlations between physical domain of the WHOQOL-BREF and activity, impacts and total domains of the SGRQ, and between psychological domain of the WHOQOL-BREF and impacts and total domains of the SGRQ. Eighteen items were significantly associated with lung function, particularly those items relating to mobility/walking and activities of daily living (ADL). Conclusion: Both the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ showed comparable reliability and validity. Items related to mobility/walking and ADL may be useful in clinical screening for lung function impairment.

AB - Aims: To compare the psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) instrument and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and to examine the association between pulmonary function and domains and items of these questionnaires in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: The WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ were administered to 211 patients. The reliability and validity of, and correlations among, the domain scores were examined. Multiple regression analyses were performed to identify which items were independently associated with subjects' lung functions. Results: Both questionnaires showed good internal consistency (α > 0.8), except the SGRQ symptoms domain (α = 0.66), minimal ceiling and floor effects, and good item convergent and item discriminant validity. There were moderate correlations between physical domain of the WHOQOL-BREF and activity, impacts and total domains of the SGRQ, and between psychological domain of the WHOQOL-BREF and impacts and total domains of the SGRQ. Eighteen items were significantly associated with lung function, particularly those items relating to mobility/walking and activities of daily living (ADL). Conclusion: Both the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ showed comparable reliability and validity. Items related to mobility/walking and ADL may be useful in clinical screening for lung function impairment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49949152496&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=49949152496&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11136-008-9326-5

DO - 10.1007/s11136-008-9326-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 18500580

AN - SCOPUS:49949152496

VL - 17

SP - 793

EP - 800

JO - Quality of Life Research

JF - Quality of Life Research

SN - 0962-9343

IS - 5

ER -