Abstract
Background and Objective: Physicians may find it confusing to decide whether to report diagnoses in part I or part II of the death certificate. The aim of this study was to contrast differences in diabetes mortality through a comparison of physicians' habits in reporting diabetes in part I of death certification among Taiwan, Australia, and Sweden. Methods: A cross-sectional, intercountry comparison study. We calculated the proportion of deaths with mention of diabetes in which diabetes was reported in part I of the death certificate and the proportion of deaths with mention of diabetes in which diabetes was selected as underlying cause of death. Results: We found that half of the differences in reported diabetes mortality among Taiwan, Australia, and Sweden were due to differences in reporting deaths with mention of diabetes anywhere on the certificate, and half due to differences in proportion of deaths with mention of diabetes in which diabetes was reported in part I of the death certificate. Conclusion: Differences in the reporting of diabetes in part I of the death certificate among physicians in Taiwan, Australia, and Sweden was one of the factors that affected differing reported diabetes mortality in Taiwan, Australia, and Sweden.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1150-1157 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2005 Nov 1 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Medicine(all)
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Epidemiology
Cite this
}
An international comparison study indicated physicians' habits in reporting diabetes in part I of death certificate affected reported national diabetes mortality. / Lu, Tsung-Hsueh; Walker, Sue; Johansson, Lars Age; Huang, Chien Ning.
In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 58, No. 11, 01.11.2005, p. 1150-1157.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - An international comparison study indicated physicians' habits in reporting diabetes in part I of death certificate affected reported national diabetes mortality
AU - Lu, Tsung-Hsueh
AU - Walker, Sue
AU - Johansson, Lars Age
AU - Huang, Chien Ning
PY - 2005/11/1
Y1 - 2005/11/1
N2 - Background and Objective: Physicians may find it confusing to decide whether to report diagnoses in part I or part II of the death certificate. The aim of this study was to contrast differences in diabetes mortality through a comparison of physicians' habits in reporting diabetes in part I of death certification among Taiwan, Australia, and Sweden. Methods: A cross-sectional, intercountry comparison study. We calculated the proportion of deaths with mention of diabetes in which diabetes was reported in part I of the death certificate and the proportion of deaths with mention of diabetes in which diabetes was selected as underlying cause of death. Results: We found that half of the differences in reported diabetes mortality among Taiwan, Australia, and Sweden were due to differences in reporting deaths with mention of diabetes anywhere on the certificate, and half due to differences in proportion of deaths with mention of diabetes in which diabetes was reported in part I of the death certificate. Conclusion: Differences in the reporting of diabetes in part I of the death certificate among physicians in Taiwan, Australia, and Sweden was one of the factors that affected differing reported diabetes mortality in Taiwan, Australia, and Sweden.
AB - Background and Objective: Physicians may find it confusing to decide whether to report diagnoses in part I or part II of the death certificate. The aim of this study was to contrast differences in diabetes mortality through a comparison of physicians' habits in reporting diabetes in part I of death certification among Taiwan, Australia, and Sweden. Methods: A cross-sectional, intercountry comparison study. We calculated the proportion of deaths with mention of diabetes in which diabetes was reported in part I of the death certificate and the proportion of deaths with mention of diabetes in which diabetes was selected as underlying cause of death. Results: We found that half of the differences in reported diabetes mortality among Taiwan, Australia, and Sweden were due to differences in reporting deaths with mention of diabetes anywhere on the certificate, and half due to differences in proportion of deaths with mention of diabetes in which diabetes was reported in part I of the death certificate. Conclusion: Differences in the reporting of diabetes in part I of the death certificate among physicians in Taiwan, Australia, and Sweden was one of the factors that affected differing reported diabetes mortality in Taiwan, Australia, and Sweden.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=26644436951&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=26644436951&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.03.009
DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.03.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 16223658
AN - SCOPUS:26644436951
VL - 58
SP - 1150
EP - 1157
JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
SN - 0895-4356
IS - 11
ER -