TY - JOUR
T1 - Application of an Ion‐Packing Model Based on Defect Clusters to Zirconia Solid Solutions
T2 - II, Applicability of Vegard's Law
AU - Yashima, Masatomo
AU - Ishizawa, Nobuo
AU - Yoshimura, Masahiro
PY - 1992/6
Y1 - 1992/6
N2 - Lattice parameter data of cubic phases and cube roots of unit cell volumes of tetragonal phases in homogeneous ZrO2‐containing solid solutions were compiled to examine the validity of Vegard's law. Except for ZrO2–CeO2 and ZrO2–UO2 systems, the data for cubic phases were expressed by the equation d=asX+b, where d, as, X, and b denote the lattice parameter, a constant depending on dopant species, the dopant content, and a constant independent of dopant species, respectively. For tetragonal phases, the cube roots of unit‐cell volumes could be fitted by a similar equation except for the data in the ZrO2–MO2 systems (M = Ge and U). The constant as was calculated using an ion‐packing model and was independent of the defect cluster models. The calculated as is close to the experimentally observed one, although the former is slightly smaller than the latter in the ZrO2–MOu systems (u= 1 and 1.5). This difference was ascribed to the lack of consideration of the ionic distortions from the ideal sites of the fluorite‐type structure.
AB - Lattice parameter data of cubic phases and cube roots of unit cell volumes of tetragonal phases in homogeneous ZrO2‐containing solid solutions were compiled to examine the validity of Vegard's law. Except for ZrO2–CeO2 and ZrO2–UO2 systems, the data for cubic phases were expressed by the equation d=asX+b, where d, as, X, and b denote the lattice parameter, a constant depending on dopant species, the dopant content, and a constant independent of dopant species, respectively. For tetragonal phases, the cube roots of unit‐cell volumes could be fitted by a similar equation except for the data in the ZrO2–MO2 systems (M = Ge and U). The constant as was calculated using an ion‐packing model and was independent of the defect cluster models. The calculated as is close to the experimentally observed one, although the former is slightly smaller than the latter in the ZrO2–MOu systems (u= 1 and 1.5). This difference was ascribed to the lack of consideration of the ionic distortions from the ideal sites of the fluorite‐type structure.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84985162736
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84985162736#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb04223.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb04223.x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84985162736
SN - 0002-7820
VL - 75
SP - 1550
EP - 1557
JO - Journal of the American Ceramic Society
JF - Journal of the American Ceramic Society
IS - 6
ER -