Assessing in situ Radionuclide Migration from Natural Analog Studies: Response to McKinley and Alexander (1996)

Teh Lung Ku, Shangde Luo, Bret W. Leslie, Douglas E. Hammond

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

McKinley and Alexander (1996) criticized the model formulation of Ku et al. (1992) that described the use of naturally occurring U-Th series disequilibria in rock-water systems for evaluating the in situ retardation of radionuclide migration. Many of these criticisms appear to result from a misunderstanding of the model development and the formulation of the rock-water exchange terms. We present a clarification of the issues they have raised.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)219-223
Number of pages5
JournalRadiochimica Acta
Volume80
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1998 Jan 1

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing in situ Radionuclide Migration from Natural Analog Studies: Response to McKinley and Alexander (1996)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this