TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of EFD and CFD capability for KRISO Container Ship added power in head and oblique waves
AU - Sanada, Yugo
AU - Kim, Dong Hwan
AU - Sadat-Hosseini, Hamid
AU - Stern, Frederick
AU - Hossain, Md Alfaz
AU - Wu, Ping Chen
AU - Toda, Yasuyuki
AU - Otzen, Janne
AU - Simonsen, Claus
AU - Abdel-Maksoud, Moustafa
AU - Scharf, Martin
AU - Grigoropoulos, Gregory
N1 - Funding Information:
The research at IIHR was supported by the Office of Naval Research grants N00014-17-1-2083 and N00014-17-1-2084 under administration Drs. Thomas Fu, Woei-Min Lin and Ki-Han Kim sponsored this research. The simulations were performed using DoD, Navy DSRC HPCMP resources including 18 Pathfinder program allocations. The research is a collaborative effort with FORCE-DMI, Denmark , and Osaka University, Japan , which is supported by their respective Office of Naval Research Global NICOP grants . Prof. Hironori Yasukawa, Hiroshima University, Japan provided the POT data.
Funding Information:
The research at IIHR was supported by the Office of Naval Research grants N00014-17-1-2083 and N00014-17-1-2084 under administration Drs. Thomas Fu, Woei-Min Lin and Ki-Han Kim sponsored this research. The simulations were performed using DoD, Navy DSRC HPCMP resources including 18 Pathfinder program allocations. The research is a collaborative effort with FORCE-DMI, Denmark, and Osaka University, Japan, which is supported by their respective Office of Naval Research Global NICOP grants. Prof. Hironori Yasukawa, Hiroshima University, Japan provided the POT data.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/1/1
Y1 - 2022/1/1
N2 - EFD and CFD capability assessment for KCS added power (AP) in head and oblique waves are conducted based on experiments from three facilities using three different model sizes and CFD from five institutes. The analysis includes the standard deviation (SD) in both CFD and EFD to identify facility biases, scale effects and CFD errors for motions, self-propulsion (SP), propulsive efficiency (η) and AP. The overall SD%D (D: EFD values) for all calm water SP variables and AP variables is 9% and 11%, respectively. SP correlates with Re via advance coefficient J(Re) and SP points lie along nondimensional propeller load curves. AP vs. λ/L correlates with large bow relative motion such that the wave effects on J(λ/L) have the same scaling as the model size effect J(Re). Logarithmic derivative analysis of EFD data shows that for head waves the added resistance (AR) and η are responsible for 70 vs. 30%AP, respectively, whereas for oblique waves the AR and η are responsible for 55 vs. 38%AP, respectively. The overall conclusion is that the experimental and CFD approaches are of sufficient accuracy to be useful for design.
AB - EFD and CFD capability assessment for KCS added power (AP) in head and oblique waves are conducted based on experiments from three facilities using three different model sizes and CFD from five institutes. The analysis includes the standard deviation (SD) in both CFD and EFD to identify facility biases, scale effects and CFD errors for motions, self-propulsion (SP), propulsive efficiency (η) and AP. The overall SD%D (D: EFD values) for all calm water SP variables and AP variables is 9% and 11%, respectively. SP correlates with Re via advance coefficient J(Re) and SP points lie along nondimensional propeller load curves. AP vs. λ/L correlates with large bow relative motion such that the wave effects on J(λ/L) have the same scaling as the model size effect J(Re). Logarithmic derivative analysis of EFD data shows that for head waves the added resistance (AR) and η are responsible for 70 vs. 30%AP, respectively, whereas for oblique waves the AR and η are responsible for 55 vs. 38%AP, respectively. The overall conclusion is that the experimental and CFD approaches are of sufficient accuracy to be useful for design.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120358912&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85120358912&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.110224
DO - 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.110224
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85120358912
SN - 0029-8018
VL - 243
JO - Ocean Engineering
JF - Ocean Engineering
M1 - 110224
ER -