TY - JOUR
T1 - Biobanking and consenting to research
T2 - a qualitative thematic analysis of young people’s perspectives in the North East of England
AU - DIAMONDS Consortium
AU - van der Velden, Fabian J.S.
AU - Lim, Emma
AU - Gills, Lily
AU - Broadey, Jasmin
AU - Hayes, Louise
AU - Roberts, Eve
AU - Courtney, Jack
AU - Ball, Joanne
AU - Herberg, Jethro
AU - Galassini, Rachel
AU - Emonts, Marieke
AU - Levin, Michael
AU - Cunnington, Aubrey
AU - Kaforou, Myrsini
AU - Wright, Victoria
AU - Bellos, Evangelos
AU - Broderick, Claire
AU - Channon-Wells, Samuel
AU - Cooray, Samantha
AU - De, Tisham
AU - D’Souza, Giselle
AU - Elorrieta, Leire Estramiana
AU - Estrada-Rivadeneyra, Diego
AU - Habgood-Coote, Dominic
AU - Hamilton, Shea
AU - Jackson, Heather
AU - Kavanagh, James
AU - Marjaneh, Mahdi Moradi
AU - Nichols, Samuel
AU - Nijman, Ruud
AU - Patel, Harsita
AU - Pennisi, Ivana
AU - Powell, Oliver
AU - Reid, Ruth
AU - Shah, Priyen
AU - Vito, Ortensia
AU - Whittaker, Elizabeth
AU - Wilson, Clare
AU - Womersley, Rebecca
AU - Abdulla, Amina
AU - Darnell, Sarah
AU - Mustafa, Sobia
AU - Georgiou, Pantelis
AU - Manzano, Jesus Rodriguez
AU - Moser, Nicolas
AU - Carter, Michael
AU - Tibby, Shane
AU - Cohen, Jonathan
AU - Davis, Francesca
AU - Ching-Fen, Shen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Background: Biobanking biospecimens and consent are common practice in paediatric research. We need to explore children and young people’s (CYP) knowledge and perspectives around the use of and consent to biobanking. This will ensure meaningful informed consent can be obtained and improve current consent procedures. Methods: We designed a survey, in co-production with CYP, collecting demographic data, views on biobanking, and consent using three scenarios: 1) prospective consent, 2) deferred consent, and 3) reconsent and assent at age of capacity. The survey was disseminated via the Young Person’s Advisory Group North England (YPAGne) and participating CYP’s secondary schools. Data were analysed using a qualitative thematic approach by three independent reviewers (including CYP) to identify common themes. Data triangulation occurred independently by a fourth reviewer. Results: One hundred two CYP completed the survey. Most were between 16–18 years (63.7%, N = 65) and female (66.7%, N = 68). 72.3% had no prior knowledge of biobanking (N = 73). Acceptability of prospective consent for biobanking was high (91.2%, N = 93) with common themes: ‘altruism’, ‘potential benefits outweigh individual risk’, 'frugality', and ‘(in)convenience’. Deferred consent was also deemed acceptable in the large majority (84.3%, N = 86), with common themes: ‘altruism’, ‘body integrity’ and ‘sample frugality’. 76.5% preferred to reconsent when cognitively mature enough to give assent (N = 78), even if parental consent was previously in place. 79.2% wanted to be informed if their biobanked biospecimen is reused (N = 80). Conclusion: Prospective and deferred consent acceptability for biobanking is high among CYP in the UK. Altruism, frugality, body integrity, and privacy are the most important themes. Clear communication and justification are paramount to obtain consent. Any CYP with capacity should be part of the consenting procedure, if possible.
AB - Background: Biobanking biospecimens and consent are common practice in paediatric research. We need to explore children and young people’s (CYP) knowledge and perspectives around the use of and consent to biobanking. This will ensure meaningful informed consent can be obtained and improve current consent procedures. Methods: We designed a survey, in co-production with CYP, collecting demographic data, views on biobanking, and consent using three scenarios: 1) prospective consent, 2) deferred consent, and 3) reconsent and assent at age of capacity. The survey was disseminated via the Young Person’s Advisory Group North England (YPAGne) and participating CYP’s secondary schools. Data were analysed using a qualitative thematic approach by three independent reviewers (including CYP) to identify common themes. Data triangulation occurred independently by a fourth reviewer. Results: One hundred two CYP completed the survey. Most were between 16–18 years (63.7%, N = 65) and female (66.7%, N = 68). 72.3% had no prior knowledge of biobanking (N = 73). Acceptability of prospective consent for biobanking was high (91.2%, N = 93) with common themes: ‘altruism’, ‘potential benefits outweigh individual risk’, 'frugality', and ‘(in)convenience’. Deferred consent was also deemed acceptable in the large majority (84.3%, N = 86), with common themes: ‘altruism’, ‘body integrity’ and ‘sample frugality’. 76.5% preferred to reconsent when cognitively mature enough to give assent (N = 78), even if parental consent was previously in place. 79.2% wanted to be informed if their biobanked biospecimen is reused (N = 80). Conclusion: Prospective and deferred consent acceptability for biobanking is high among CYP in the UK. Altruism, frugality, body integrity, and privacy are the most important themes. Clear communication and justification are paramount to obtain consent. Any CYP with capacity should be part of the consenting procedure, if possible.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164028753&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85164028753&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12910-023-00925-w
DO - 10.1186/s12910-023-00925-w
M3 - Article
C2 - 37407992
AN - SCOPUS:85164028753
SN - 1472-6939
VL - 24
JO - BMC Medical Ethics
JF - BMC Medical Ethics
IS - 1
M1 - 47
ER -