TY - JOUR
T1 - Biomechanic Evaluation of Upper-Extremity Symmetry During Manual Wheelchair Propulsion Over Varied Terrain
AU - Hurd, Wendy J.
AU - Morrow, Melissa M.
AU - Kaufman, Kenton R.
AU - An, Kai Nan
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2008/10
Y1 - 2008/10
N2 - Hurd WJ, Morrow MM, Kaufman KR, An K-N. Biomechanic evaluation of upper-extremity symmetry during manual wheelchair propulsion over varied terrain. Objective: To evaluate upper-extremity symmetry during wheelchair propulsion across multiple terrain surfaces. Design: Case series. Setting: A biomechanics laboratory and the general community. Participants: Manual wheelchair users (N=12). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Symmetry indexes for the propulsion moment, total force, tangential force, fractional effective force, time-to-peak propulsion moment, work, length of push cycle, and power during wheelchair propulsion over outdoor and indoor community conditions, and in laboratory conditions. Results: Upper-extremity asymmetry was present within each condition. There were no differences in the magnitude of asymmetry when comparing laboratory with indoor community conditions. Outdoor community wheelchair propulsion asymmetry was significantly greater than asymmetry measured during laboratory conditions. Conclusions: Investigators should be aware that manual wheelchair propulsion is an asymmetrical act, which may influence interpretation when data is collected from a single limb or averaged for both limbs. The greater asymmetry identified during outdoor versus laboratory conditions emphasizes the need to evaluate wheelchair biomechanics in the user's natural environment.
AB - Hurd WJ, Morrow MM, Kaufman KR, An K-N. Biomechanic evaluation of upper-extremity symmetry during manual wheelchair propulsion over varied terrain. Objective: To evaluate upper-extremity symmetry during wheelchair propulsion across multiple terrain surfaces. Design: Case series. Setting: A biomechanics laboratory and the general community. Participants: Manual wheelchair users (N=12). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Symmetry indexes for the propulsion moment, total force, tangential force, fractional effective force, time-to-peak propulsion moment, work, length of push cycle, and power during wheelchair propulsion over outdoor and indoor community conditions, and in laboratory conditions. Results: Upper-extremity asymmetry was present within each condition. There were no differences in the magnitude of asymmetry when comparing laboratory with indoor community conditions. Outdoor community wheelchair propulsion asymmetry was significantly greater than asymmetry measured during laboratory conditions. Conclusions: Investigators should be aware that manual wheelchair propulsion is an asymmetrical act, which may influence interpretation when data is collected from a single limb or averaged for both limbs. The greater asymmetry identified during outdoor versus laboratory conditions emphasizes the need to evaluate wheelchair biomechanics in the user's natural environment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=55649086401&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=55649086401&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.03.020
DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.03.020
M3 - Article
C2 - 18929029
AN - SCOPUS:55649086401
SN - 0003-9993
VL - 89
SP - 1996
EP - 2002
JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
IS - 10
ER -