Biomechanical comparison of the role of inlay graft in proximal humerus fracture fixed with conventional plate and locking plate

Cheng Hung Lee, Kui Chou Huang, Chih Kun Hsiao, Sung Cheng, Yau Chia Liu, Chih-Han Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

With a varus deformity, repairs of proximal humeral fractures frequently fail after screws pull out due to lack of medial support. Indirect intramedullary grafts have been used to prevent such complications. A biomechanical study was performed to investigate the role of an intramedullary bone peg (strut) in fractures fixed with conventional and locking plates. Twenty artificial proximal humerus specimens were divided into four groups. Group 1 specimens were fixed with convention plates and group 2 specimens were fixed with the addition of a bone peg. Groups 3 and 4 specimens were fixed using locking plate and additional bone peg, respectively. All specimens were tested with a static loading test, and the axial stiffness and maximal load were recorded. Locking plates with inlay graft were the most rigid of the four groups. When an intramedullary graft was introduced, the maximal load increased by more than 200%, whether conventional or locking plates were used. The maximal load of a conventional plate with inlay graft was more than twice of that of the locking plate only. Indirect medial support acts as an anti-bending device, reducing the tension on the plate. It also decreases varus deformity and loosening of screws. Locking plate stabilize the plate-bone interface. Locking plate with indirect medial support is thus recommended for patients withsevere osteoporotic or medial comminuted proximal humeral fractures.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1350055
JournalJournal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Aug 1

Fingerprint

Grafts
Bone
Struts
Loads (forces)
Repair
Stiffness

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biomedical Engineering

Cite this

@article{7c303f12f29c41cbbeb66b6ffa66ccd9,
title = "Biomechanical comparison of the role of inlay graft in proximal humerus fracture fixed with conventional plate and locking plate",
abstract = "With a varus deformity, repairs of proximal humeral fractures frequently fail after screws pull out due to lack of medial support. Indirect intramedullary grafts have been used to prevent such complications. A biomechanical study was performed to investigate the role of an intramedullary bone peg (strut) in fractures fixed with conventional and locking plates. Twenty artificial proximal humerus specimens were divided into four groups. Group 1 specimens were fixed with convention plates and group 2 specimens were fixed with the addition of a bone peg. Groups 3 and 4 specimens were fixed using locking plate and additional bone peg, respectively. All specimens were tested with a static loading test, and the axial stiffness and maximal load were recorded. Locking plates with inlay graft were the most rigid of the four groups. When an intramedullary graft was introduced, the maximal load increased by more than 200{\%}, whether conventional or locking plates were used. The maximal load of a conventional plate with inlay graft was more than twice of that of the locking plate only. Indirect medial support acts as an anti-bending device, reducing the tension on the plate. It also decreases varus deformity and loosening of screws. Locking plate stabilize the plate-bone interface. Locking plate with indirect medial support is thus recommended for patients withsevere osteoporotic or medial comminuted proximal humeral fractures.",
author = "Lee, {Cheng Hung} and Huang, {Kui Chou} and Hsiao, {Chih Kun} and Sung Cheng and Liu, {Yau Chia} and Chih-Han Chang",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1142/S0219519413500553",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology",
issn = "0219-5194",
publisher = "World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Biomechanical comparison of the role of inlay graft in proximal humerus fracture fixed with conventional plate and locking plate. / Lee, Cheng Hung; Huang, Kui Chou; Hsiao, Chih Kun; Cheng, Sung; Liu, Yau Chia; Chang, Chih-Han.

In: Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 13, No. 4, 1350055, 01.08.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biomechanical comparison of the role of inlay graft in proximal humerus fracture fixed with conventional plate and locking plate

AU - Lee, Cheng Hung

AU - Huang, Kui Chou

AU - Hsiao, Chih Kun

AU - Cheng, Sung

AU - Liu, Yau Chia

AU - Chang, Chih-Han

PY - 2013/8/1

Y1 - 2013/8/1

N2 - With a varus deformity, repairs of proximal humeral fractures frequently fail after screws pull out due to lack of medial support. Indirect intramedullary grafts have been used to prevent such complications. A biomechanical study was performed to investigate the role of an intramedullary bone peg (strut) in fractures fixed with conventional and locking plates. Twenty artificial proximal humerus specimens were divided into four groups. Group 1 specimens were fixed with convention plates and group 2 specimens were fixed with the addition of a bone peg. Groups 3 and 4 specimens were fixed using locking plate and additional bone peg, respectively. All specimens were tested with a static loading test, and the axial stiffness and maximal load were recorded. Locking plates with inlay graft were the most rigid of the four groups. When an intramedullary graft was introduced, the maximal load increased by more than 200%, whether conventional or locking plates were used. The maximal load of a conventional plate with inlay graft was more than twice of that of the locking plate only. Indirect medial support acts as an anti-bending device, reducing the tension on the plate. It also decreases varus deformity and loosening of screws. Locking plate stabilize the plate-bone interface. Locking plate with indirect medial support is thus recommended for patients withsevere osteoporotic or medial comminuted proximal humeral fractures.

AB - With a varus deformity, repairs of proximal humeral fractures frequently fail after screws pull out due to lack of medial support. Indirect intramedullary grafts have been used to prevent such complications. A biomechanical study was performed to investigate the role of an intramedullary bone peg (strut) in fractures fixed with conventional and locking plates. Twenty artificial proximal humerus specimens were divided into four groups. Group 1 specimens were fixed with convention plates and group 2 specimens were fixed with the addition of a bone peg. Groups 3 and 4 specimens were fixed using locking plate and additional bone peg, respectively. All specimens were tested with a static loading test, and the axial stiffness and maximal load were recorded. Locking plates with inlay graft were the most rigid of the four groups. When an intramedullary graft was introduced, the maximal load increased by more than 200%, whether conventional or locking plates were used. The maximal load of a conventional plate with inlay graft was more than twice of that of the locking plate only. Indirect medial support acts as an anti-bending device, reducing the tension on the plate. It also decreases varus deformity and loosening of screws. Locking plate stabilize the plate-bone interface. Locking plate with indirect medial support is thus recommended for patients withsevere osteoporotic or medial comminuted proximal humeral fractures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880176914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880176914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1142/S0219519413500553

DO - 10.1142/S0219519413500553

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84880176914

VL - 13

JO - Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology

JF - Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology

SN - 0219-5194

IS - 4

M1 - 1350055

ER -