TY - JOUR
T1 - Bone-targeting agents in major solid tumour metastases
T2 - A multinational cohort study
AU - Kim, Ju Hwan
AU - Shen, Chin Yao
AU - Au, Philip Chun Ming
AU - Baek, Yeon Hee
AU - Cheung, Ching Lung
AU - Chung, Wei Pang
AU - Kleinman, Nora Joelle
AU - Lam, Tai Chung
AU - Liao, Tzu Chi
AU - Lin, Tzu Chieh
AU - Shin, Ju Young
AU - Sing, Chor Wing
AU - Wong, Ian Chi Kei
AU - Lai, Edward Chia Cheng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2022/2/17
Y1 - 2022/2/17
N2 - Objective To describe the epidemiology, clinical characteristics and utilisation patterns of bone-targeting agents (BTAs) in patients with bone metastases from breast, prostate and lung cancer. Methods This is a multinational retrospective cohort study including patients with three major solid tumours (breast, prostate and lung cancer) and newly initiated on BTAs (ie, denosumab, zoledronic acid and pamidronate). Records were retrieved from nationwide health databases from Hong Kong and Taiwan (HK and TW: 2013-2017) and Korea (KR: 2012-2016). Descriptive analyses included the annual incidence rates of bone metastases and the cumulative incidence curves of BTA initiation. We used Sankey diagrams to visualise the dynamic BTA utilisation patterns. Results The annual incidence rate of bone metastases ranged from 3.5% to 4.5% in TW, from 9.6% to 10.3% in HK and from 2.9% to 3.8% in KR. We identified 14.1% (5127), 9.3% (883) and 9.4% (4800) of patients with bone metastases newly initiated on BTAs in TW, HK and KR, respectively. The most frequently used BTA in TW (67.1%) and HK (51.9%) was denosumab, while in KR (84.8%) it was zoledronic acid. Sankey diagrams indicated the proportion of patients remaining on denosumab was highest in TW and HK, while it was zoledronic acid in KR. Specifically, in TW, patients who were on bisphosphonates or had discontinued treatment frequently switched to or reinitiated denosumab. Conclusions We found the rate of BTA utilisation remained low across all sites and tumour types in recent years. The dynamic utilisation patterns of BTAs provide better understanding of the treatment landscape for future evaluation of associated outcomes of patients.
AB - Objective To describe the epidemiology, clinical characteristics and utilisation patterns of bone-targeting agents (BTAs) in patients with bone metastases from breast, prostate and lung cancer. Methods This is a multinational retrospective cohort study including patients with three major solid tumours (breast, prostate and lung cancer) and newly initiated on BTAs (ie, denosumab, zoledronic acid and pamidronate). Records were retrieved from nationwide health databases from Hong Kong and Taiwan (HK and TW: 2013-2017) and Korea (KR: 2012-2016). Descriptive analyses included the annual incidence rates of bone metastases and the cumulative incidence curves of BTA initiation. We used Sankey diagrams to visualise the dynamic BTA utilisation patterns. Results The annual incidence rate of bone metastases ranged from 3.5% to 4.5% in TW, from 9.6% to 10.3% in HK and from 2.9% to 3.8% in KR. We identified 14.1% (5127), 9.3% (883) and 9.4% (4800) of patients with bone metastases newly initiated on BTAs in TW, HK and KR, respectively. The most frequently used BTA in TW (67.1%) and HK (51.9%) was denosumab, while in KR (84.8%) it was zoledronic acid. Sankey diagrams indicated the proportion of patients remaining on denosumab was highest in TW and HK, while it was zoledronic acid in KR. Specifically, in TW, patients who were on bisphosphonates or had discontinued treatment frequently switched to or reinitiated denosumab. Conclusions We found the rate of BTA utilisation remained low across all sites and tumour types in recent years. The dynamic utilisation patterns of BTAs provide better understanding of the treatment landscape for future evaluation of associated outcomes of patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142481790&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85142481790&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003062
DO - 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003062
M3 - Article
C2 - 35177433
AN - SCOPUS:85142481790
SN - 2045-435X
VL - 13
SP - E1064-E1073
JO - BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care
JF - BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care
IS - e3
ER -