Building criteria for evaluating green project management: An integrated approach of DEMATEL and ANP

Ying Chyi Chou, Chia Han Yang, Ching Hua Lu, Van Thac Dang, Pei An Yang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A complete framework for assessing a green project management has not been clearly identified in prior literature. The purpose of this paper is to develop a set of dimensions and criteria for evaluating a green project management. An integrated approach combining the decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) and the analytical network process (ANP) is used to determine the interrelationship structure and priority of each dimension and each criterion in a green project management. Six dimensions and twenty-four criteria of a green project management are identified based on related research in the fields of environmental sustainability and supply chain management. The empirical results show the interrelationship structure and priority of each dimension and each criterion in a green project management. The findings of this study provide important implications for both managerial managers and academic researchers.

Original languageEnglish
Article number740
JournalSustainability (Switzerland)
Volume9
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Building criteria for evaluating green project management: An integrated approach of DEMATEL and ANP'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this