Combustion in meso-scale vortex chambers

Ming-Hsun Wu, Yanxing Wang, Vigor Yang, Richard A. Yetter

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Vortex flows were utilized as a means to stabilize gaseous flames in meso-/micro-scale non-premixed combustors for use in small-scale power and propulsion systems. Scaling studies were performed with a series of combustors ranging in size from ∼10.6 to 124 mm3 (i.e., combustor diameters of 2.4-6.4 mm). Three-dimensional modeling of reacting flows was also conducted to explore flame stabilization mechanism and flow evolution in the chamber. Combustor performance was evaluated by analyzing the stability limit and chemical efficiency. Both hydrogen and hydrocarbons (methane and propane) have been studied with the chemical energy varying from 25 to 174 W. For the largest combustion volume, hydrogen and hydrocarbons burned efficiently in air. However, for smaller volumes, oxygen enrichment in air was required to stabilize hydrocarbon flames. Flame stabilization was achieved by a large, relatively quiescent, hot core flow that was formed by the flow recirculation at the head- and tail-ends of the combustor. The stability limits for hydrogen/air mixtures, in terms of the overall equivalence ratio, were found to be ~0.25 on the lean-side and in the range of 3-6 on the rich-side. The corresponding chemical efficiency exceeded 97%. For propane/air combustion, the stability limits ranged from ∼0.25 to 2 for the 124 mm3 combustor. Methane was the most difficult fuel to stabilize the flame and required oxygen-enriched air containing 40% O2 and 60% N2 by volume to operate in the 10.6 mm3 combustor with a chemical efficiency of more than 85%.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3235-3242
Number of pages8
JournalProceedings of the Combustion Institute
Volume31 II
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007 Sep 24
Event31st International Symposium on Combustion - Heidelberg, Germany
Duration: 2006 Aug 52006 Aug 11

Fingerprint

combustion chambers
Combustors
Vortex flow
chambers
vortices
flames
Hydrocarbons
air
Hydrogen
Air
Propane
hydrocarbons
Methane
propane
hydrogen
methane
Stabilization
stabilization
core flow
Oxygen

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Chemical Engineering(all)
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

Cite this

Wu, Ming-Hsun ; Wang, Yanxing ; Yang, Vigor ; Yetter, Richard A. / Combustion in meso-scale vortex chambers. In: Proceedings of the Combustion Institute. 2007 ; Vol. 31 II. pp. 3235-3242.
@article{67a78f30cd9c4e678c3f14b906bd4a84,
title = "Combustion in meso-scale vortex chambers",
abstract = "Vortex flows were utilized as a means to stabilize gaseous flames in meso-/micro-scale non-premixed combustors for use in small-scale power and propulsion systems. Scaling studies were performed with a series of combustors ranging in size from ∼10.6 to 124 mm3 (i.e., combustor diameters of 2.4-6.4 mm). Three-dimensional modeling of reacting flows was also conducted to explore flame stabilization mechanism and flow evolution in the chamber. Combustor performance was evaluated by analyzing the stability limit and chemical efficiency. Both hydrogen and hydrocarbons (methane and propane) have been studied with the chemical energy varying from 25 to 174 W. For the largest combustion volume, hydrogen and hydrocarbons burned efficiently in air. However, for smaller volumes, oxygen enrichment in air was required to stabilize hydrocarbon flames. Flame stabilization was achieved by a large, relatively quiescent, hot core flow that was formed by the flow recirculation at the head- and tail-ends of the combustor. The stability limits for hydrogen/air mixtures, in terms of the overall equivalence ratio, were found to be ~0.25 on the lean-side and in the range of 3-6 on the rich-side. The corresponding chemical efficiency exceeded 97{\%}. For propane/air combustion, the stability limits ranged from ∼0.25 to 2 for the 124 mm3 combustor. Methane was the most difficult fuel to stabilize the flame and required oxygen-enriched air containing 40{\%} O2 and 60{\%} N2 by volume to operate in the 10.6 mm3 combustor with a chemical efficiency of more than 85{\%}.",
author = "Ming-Hsun Wu and Yanxing Wang and Vigor Yang and Yetter, {Richard A.}",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1016/j.proci.2006.08.114",
language = "English",
volume = "31 II",
pages = "3235--3242",
journal = "Proceedings of the Combustion Institute",
issn = "1540-7489",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Combustion in meso-scale vortex chambers. / Wu, Ming-Hsun; Wang, Yanxing; Yang, Vigor; Yetter, Richard A.

In: Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, Vol. 31 II, 24.09.2007, p. 3235-3242.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Combustion in meso-scale vortex chambers

AU - Wu, Ming-Hsun

AU - Wang, Yanxing

AU - Yang, Vigor

AU - Yetter, Richard A.

PY - 2007/9/24

Y1 - 2007/9/24

N2 - Vortex flows were utilized as a means to stabilize gaseous flames in meso-/micro-scale non-premixed combustors for use in small-scale power and propulsion systems. Scaling studies were performed with a series of combustors ranging in size from ∼10.6 to 124 mm3 (i.e., combustor diameters of 2.4-6.4 mm). Three-dimensional modeling of reacting flows was also conducted to explore flame stabilization mechanism and flow evolution in the chamber. Combustor performance was evaluated by analyzing the stability limit and chemical efficiency. Both hydrogen and hydrocarbons (methane and propane) have been studied with the chemical energy varying from 25 to 174 W. For the largest combustion volume, hydrogen and hydrocarbons burned efficiently in air. However, for smaller volumes, oxygen enrichment in air was required to stabilize hydrocarbon flames. Flame stabilization was achieved by a large, relatively quiescent, hot core flow that was formed by the flow recirculation at the head- and tail-ends of the combustor. The stability limits for hydrogen/air mixtures, in terms of the overall equivalence ratio, were found to be ~0.25 on the lean-side and in the range of 3-6 on the rich-side. The corresponding chemical efficiency exceeded 97%. For propane/air combustion, the stability limits ranged from ∼0.25 to 2 for the 124 mm3 combustor. Methane was the most difficult fuel to stabilize the flame and required oxygen-enriched air containing 40% O2 and 60% N2 by volume to operate in the 10.6 mm3 combustor with a chemical efficiency of more than 85%.

AB - Vortex flows were utilized as a means to stabilize gaseous flames in meso-/micro-scale non-premixed combustors for use in small-scale power and propulsion systems. Scaling studies were performed with a series of combustors ranging in size from ∼10.6 to 124 mm3 (i.e., combustor diameters of 2.4-6.4 mm). Three-dimensional modeling of reacting flows was also conducted to explore flame stabilization mechanism and flow evolution in the chamber. Combustor performance was evaluated by analyzing the stability limit and chemical efficiency. Both hydrogen and hydrocarbons (methane and propane) have been studied with the chemical energy varying from 25 to 174 W. For the largest combustion volume, hydrogen and hydrocarbons burned efficiently in air. However, for smaller volumes, oxygen enrichment in air was required to stabilize hydrocarbon flames. Flame stabilization was achieved by a large, relatively quiescent, hot core flow that was formed by the flow recirculation at the head- and tail-ends of the combustor. The stability limits for hydrogen/air mixtures, in terms of the overall equivalence ratio, were found to be ~0.25 on the lean-side and in the range of 3-6 on the rich-side. The corresponding chemical efficiency exceeded 97%. For propane/air combustion, the stability limits ranged from ∼0.25 to 2 for the 124 mm3 combustor. Methane was the most difficult fuel to stabilize the flame and required oxygen-enriched air containing 40% O2 and 60% N2 by volume to operate in the 10.6 mm3 combustor with a chemical efficiency of more than 85%.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548737827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548737827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.proci.2006.08.114

DO - 10.1016/j.proci.2006.08.114

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:34548737827

VL - 31 II

SP - 3235

EP - 3242

JO - Proceedings of the Combustion Institute

JF - Proceedings of the Combustion Institute

SN - 1540-7489

ER -