TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparing stress and behavioral coping strategies during the early stages of the COVID-19 crisis among domestic and overseas Taiwanese
AU - Chen, Cheng Che
AU - Wu, Harry Yi Jui
AU - Yeh, Ming Jui
AU - Wang, Austin Horng En
N1 - Funding Information:
Special thanks to the COVIDiSTRESS global survey for collecting the data. The following people were contributors to the survey: Andreas Lieberoth; Dominik-Borna Ćepulić; Jesper Rasmussen; Giovanni A. Travaglino; and Jarno Tuominen. We thank Dr. Wei-Lieh Huang, Dr. Shu-Sen Chang and Dr. Hsing-Yi Chang for providing a perspective on psychosomatic medicine and epidemiology. Cheng-Che Chen was funded by National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-chu Branch and National Health Research Institutes [ NHRI-111-B04]. Harry Yi-Jui Wu was funded by National Cheng Kung University.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - This study reported domestic and overseas Taiwanese people’s perceived stress levels and examined the mediation effect of their coping strategies during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. We recruited 2727 Taiwanese respondents from the COVIDiSTRESS Global Survey (N = 173,426) between March 30 and May 30, 2020. The self-report questionnaire included a modified 10-item Perceived Stress Scale and a 16-item coping strategy scale. Three stress-coping factors were extracted with principal component analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Their effects were examined through a regression and mediation analysis. The overseas Taiwanese participants had a significantly higher stress level than domestic counterparts (2.89 to 2.69 in 1–5 scale, p < 0.001). Government guidance was associated with lower stress level among domestic (− 0.097, 95% C.I. [− 0.131, − 0.063]) but not overseas Taiwanese (0.025, [− 0.114, 0.163]). The association of stress level with residency was mediated by coping strategies, for government guidance (0.04, [0.01, 0.07], ref: domestic participants) and supportive social networks (− 0.03, [− 0.05, − 0.01]). All results hold after the propensity score matching on samples. Government guidance on COVID-19 as a channel for coping with stress is correlated with the residency status of the respondents. Public health authorities should recognize the importance of various mental health interventions during pandemics.
AB - This study reported domestic and overseas Taiwanese people’s perceived stress levels and examined the mediation effect of their coping strategies during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. We recruited 2727 Taiwanese respondents from the COVIDiSTRESS Global Survey (N = 173,426) between March 30 and May 30, 2020. The self-report questionnaire included a modified 10-item Perceived Stress Scale and a 16-item coping strategy scale. Three stress-coping factors were extracted with principal component analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Their effects were examined through a regression and mediation analysis. The overseas Taiwanese participants had a significantly higher stress level than domestic counterparts (2.89 to 2.69 in 1–5 scale, p < 0.001). Government guidance was associated with lower stress level among domestic (− 0.097, 95% C.I. [− 0.131, − 0.063]) but not overseas Taiwanese (0.025, [− 0.114, 0.163]). The association of stress level with residency was mediated by coping strategies, for government guidance (0.04, [0.01, 0.07], ref: domestic participants) and supportive social networks (− 0.03, [− 0.05, − 0.01]). All results hold after the propensity score matching on samples. Government guidance on COVID-19 as a channel for coping with stress is correlated with the residency status of the respondents. Public health authorities should recognize the importance of various mental health interventions during pandemics.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133684608&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85133684608&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41598-022-15567-y
DO - 10.1038/s41598-022-15567-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 35803989
AN - SCOPUS:85133684608
SN - 2045-2322
VL - 12
JO - Scientific reports
JF - Scientific reports
IS - 1
M1 - 11613
ER -