Comparison of emergency medical services systems across Pan-Asian countries: A web-based survey

Sang Do Shin, Marcus Eng Hock Ong, Hideharu Tanaka, Matthew Huei Ming Ma, Tatsuya Nishiuchi, Omer Alsakaf, Sarah Abdul Karim, Nalinas Khunkhlai, Chih-Hao Lin, Kyoung Jun Song, Hyun Wook Ryoo, Hyun Ho Ryu, Lai Peng Tham, David C. Cone

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. There are great variations in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival outcomes among different countries and different emergency medical services (EMS) systems. The impact of different systems and their contribution to enhanced survival are poorly understood. This paper compares the EMS systems of several Asian sites making up the Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study (PAROS) network. Some preliminary cardiac arrest outcomes are also reported. Methods. This is a cross-sectional descriptive survey study addressing population demographics, service levels, provider characteristics, system operations, budget and finance, medical direction (leadership), and oversight. Results. Most of the systems are single-tiered. Fire-based EMS systems are predominant. Bangkok and Kuala Lumpur have hospital-based systems. Service level is relatively low, from basic to intermediate in most of the communities. Korea, Japan, Singapore, and Bangkok have intermediate emergency medical technician (EMT) service levels, while Taiwan and Dubai have paramedic service levels. Medical direction and oversight have not been systemically established, except in some communities. Systems are mostly dependent on public funding. We found variations in available resources in terms of ambulances and providers. The number of ambulances is 0.3 to 3.2 per 100,000 population, and most ambulances are basic life support (BLS) vehicles. The number of human resources ranges from 4.0 per 100,000 population in Singapore to 55.7 per 100,000 population in Taipei. Average response times vary between 5.1 minutes (Tainan) and 22.5 minutes (Kuala Lumpur). Conclusion. We found substantial variation in 11 communities across the PAROS EMS systems. This study will provide the foundation for understanding subsequent studies arising from the PAROS effort.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)477-496
Number of pages20
JournalPrehospital Emergency Care
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Oct 1

Fingerprint

Emergency Medical Services
Ambulances
Resuscitation
Singapore
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Population
Emergency Medical Technicians
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Allied Health Personnel
Survival
Budgets
Korea
Heart Arrest
Taiwan
Reaction Time
Japan
Cross-Sectional Studies
Demography
Surveys and Questionnaires
Direction compound

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Emergency

Cite this

Shin, S. D., Hock Ong, M. E., Tanaka, H., Ma, M. H. M., Nishiuchi, T., Alsakaf, O., ... Cone, D. C. (2012). Comparison of emergency medical services systems across Pan-Asian countries: A web-based survey. Prehospital Emergency Care, 16(4), 477-496. https://doi.org/10.3109/10903127.2012.695433
Shin, Sang Do ; Hock Ong, Marcus Eng ; Tanaka, Hideharu ; Ma, Matthew Huei Ming ; Nishiuchi, Tatsuya ; Alsakaf, Omer ; Abdul Karim, Sarah ; Khunkhlai, Nalinas ; Lin, Chih-Hao ; Song, Kyoung Jun ; Ryoo, Hyun Wook ; Ryu, Hyun Ho ; Tham, Lai Peng ; Cone, David C. / Comparison of emergency medical services systems across Pan-Asian countries : A web-based survey. In: Prehospital Emergency Care. 2012 ; Vol. 16, No. 4. pp. 477-496.
@article{78094d5701e5479abbfe2593dfcf7d7b,
title = "Comparison of emergency medical services systems across Pan-Asian countries: A web-based survey",
abstract = "Background. There are great variations in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival outcomes among different countries and different emergency medical services (EMS) systems. The impact of different systems and their contribution to enhanced survival are poorly understood. This paper compares the EMS systems of several Asian sites making up the Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study (PAROS) network. Some preliminary cardiac arrest outcomes are also reported. Methods. This is a cross-sectional descriptive survey study addressing population demographics, service levels, provider characteristics, system operations, budget and finance, medical direction (leadership), and oversight. Results. Most of the systems are single-tiered. Fire-based EMS systems are predominant. Bangkok and Kuala Lumpur have hospital-based systems. Service level is relatively low, from basic to intermediate in most of the communities. Korea, Japan, Singapore, and Bangkok have intermediate emergency medical technician (EMT) service levels, while Taiwan and Dubai have paramedic service levels. Medical direction and oversight have not been systemically established, except in some communities. Systems are mostly dependent on public funding. We found variations in available resources in terms of ambulances and providers. The number of ambulances is 0.3 to 3.2 per 100,000 population, and most ambulances are basic life support (BLS) vehicles. The number of human resources ranges from 4.0 per 100,000 population in Singapore to 55.7 per 100,000 population in Taipei. Average response times vary between 5.1 minutes (Tainan) and 22.5 minutes (Kuala Lumpur). Conclusion. We found substantial variation in 11 communities across the PAROS EMS systems. This study will provide the foundation for understanding subsequent studies arising from the PAROS effort.",
author = "Shin, {Sang Do} and {Hock Ong}, {Marcus Eng} and Hideharu Tanaka and Ma, {Matthew Huei Ming} and Tatsuya Nishiuchi and Omer Alsakaf and {Abdul Karim}, Sarah and Nalinas Khunkhlai and Chih-Hao Lin and Song, {Kyoung Jun} and Ryoo, {Hyun Wook} and Ryu, {Hyun Ho} and Tham, {Lai Peng} and Cone, {David C.}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3109/10903127.2012.695433",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "477--496",
journal = "Prehospital Emergency Care",
issn = "1090-3127",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "4",

}

Shin, SD, Hock Ong, ME, Tanaka, H, Ma, MHM, Nishiuchi, T, Alsakaf, O, Abdul Karim, S, Khunkhlai, N, Lin, C-H, Song, KJ, Ryoo, HW, Ryu, HH, Tham, LP & Cone, DC 2012, 'Comparison of emergency medical services systems across Pan-Asian countries: A web-based survey', Prehospital Emergency Care, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 477-496. https://doi.org/10.3109/10903127.2012.695433

Comparison of emergency medical services systems across Pan-Asian countries : A web-based survey. / Shin, Sang Do; Hock Ong, Marcus Eng; Tanaka, Hideharu; Ma, Matthew Huei Ming; Nishiuchi, Tatsuya; Alsakaf, Omer; Abdul Karim, Sarah; Khunkhlai, Nalinas; Lin, Chih-Hao; Song, Kyoung Jun; Ryoo, Hyun Wook; Ryu, Hyun Ho; Tham, Lai Peng; Cone, David C.

In: Prehospital Emergency Care, Vol. 16, No. 4, 01.10.2012, p. 477-496.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of emergency medical services systems across Pan-Asian countries

T2 - A web-based survey

AU - Shin, Sang Do

AU - Hock Ong, Marcus Eng

AU - Tanaka, Hideharu

AU - Ma, Matthew Huei Ming

AU - Nishiuchi, Tatsuya

AU - Alsakaf, Omer

AU - Abdul Karim, Sarah

AU - Khunkhlai, Nalinas

AU - Lin, Chih-Hao

AU - Song, Kyoung Jun

AU - Ryoo, Hyun Wook

AU - Ryu, Hyun Ho

AU - Tham, Lai Peng

AU - Cone, David C.

PY - 2012/10/1

Y1 - 2012/10/1

N2 - Background. There are great variations in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival outcomes among different countries and different emergency medical services (EMS) systems. The impact of different systems and their contribution to enhanced survival are poorly understood. This paper compares the EMS systems of several Asian sites making up the Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study (PAROS) network. Some preliminary cardiac arrest outcomes are also reported. Methods. This is a cross-sectional descriptive survey study addressing population demographics, service levels, provider characteristics, system operations, budget and finance, medical direction (leadership), and oversight. Results. Most of the systems are single-tiered. Fire-based EMS systems are predominant. Bangkok and Kuala Lumpur have hospital-based systems. Service level is relatively low, from basic to intermediate in most of the communities. Korea, Japan, Singapore, and Bangkok have intermediate emergency medical technician (EMT) service levels, while Taiwan and Dubai have paramedic service levels. Medical direction and oversight have not been systemically established, except in some communities. Systems are mostly dependent on public funding. We found variations in available resources in terms of ambulances and providers. The number of ambulances is 0.3 to 3.2 per 100,000 population, and most ambulances are basic life support (BLS) vehicles. The number of human resources ranges from 4.0 per 100,000 population in Singapore to 55.7 per 100,000 population in Taipei. Average response times vary between 5.1 minutes (Tainan) and 22.5 minutes (Kuala Lumpur). Conclusion. We found substantial variation in 11 communities across the PAROS EMS systems. This study will provide the foundation for understanding subsequent studies arising from the PAROS effort.

AB - Background. There are great variations in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival outcomes among different countries and different emergency medical services (EMS) systems. The impact of different systems and their contribution to enhanced survival are poorly understood. This paper compares the EMS systems of several Asian sites making up the Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study (PAROS) network. Some preliminary cardiac arrest outcomes are also reported. Methods. This is a cross-sectional descriptive survey study addressing population demographics, service levels, provider characteristics, system operations, budget and finance, medical direction (leadership), and oversight. Results. Most of the systems are single-tiered. Fire-based EMS systems are predominant. Bangkok and Kuala Lumpur have hospital-based systems. Service level is relatively low, from basic to intermediate in most of the communities. Korea, Japan, Singapore, and Bangkok have intermediate emergency medical technician (EMT) service levels, while Taiwan and Dubai have paramedic service levels. Medical direction and oversight have not been systemically established, except in some communities. Systems are mostly dependent on public funding. We found variations in available resources in terms of ambulances and providers. The number of ambulances is 0.3 to 3.2 per 100,000 population, and most ambulances are basic life support (BLS) vehicles. The number of human resources ranges from 4.0 per 100,000 population in Singapore to 55.7 per 100,000 population in Taipei. Average response times vary between 5.1 minutes (Tainan) and 22.5 minutes (Kuala Lumpur). Conclusion. We found substantial variation in 11 communities across the PAROS EMS systems. This study will provide the foundation for understanding subsequent studies arising from the PAROS effort.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865711466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865711466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/10903127.2012.695433

DO - 10.3109/10903127.2012.695433

M3 - Review article

C2 - 22861161

AN - SCOPUS:84865711466

VL - 16

SP - 477

EP - 496

JO - Prehospital Emergency Care

JF - Prehospital Emergency Care

SN - 1090-3127

IS - 4

ER -