Comparison of older and middle-aged drivers’ driving performance in a naturalistic setting

Barbara Mazer, Yu Ting Chen, Brenda Vrkljan, Shawn C. Marshall, Judith L. Charlton, Sjaan Koppel, Isabelle Gélinas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is a concern in the public domain about driving safety among older drivers due the increase in age-associated medical conditions. It is not known how these medical changes impact driving performance and choice of driving environment. This study aimed to compare older drivers’ (≥74 years) driving performance in a naturalistic setting to middle-aged drivers (35–64 years) on their chosen driving environment, and number, type and severity of errors. The effect of sex and perceived driving ability was also examined. Drivers’ performance was studied using the electronic Driving Observation Schedule [eDOS]), a naturalistic observation approach. Fifty-three older (mean age = 80.6 years, 72% male) and 60 middle-aged (mean age = 50.0 years, 50% male) healthy drivers were recruited. Both groups made few driving errors that were mostly low-risk. Driving performance of older adults differed from middle-aged drivers; they drove on simpler routes (fewer intersections and lane changes) and made fewer errors. Findings are likely indicative of older drivers’ use of adaptive strategies to maintain safe driving.

Original languageEnglish
Article number106343
JournalAccident Analysis and Prevention
Volume161
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021 Oct

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of older and middle-aged drivers’ driving performance in a naturalistic setting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this