TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of poly(ethylene oxide) crystal orientations and crystallization behaviors in nano-confined cylinders constructed by a poly(ethylene oxide)-b-polystyrene diblock copolymer and a blend of poly(ethylene oxide)-b-polystyrene and polystyrene
AU - Huang, Ping
AU - Guo, Ya
AU - Quirk, Roderic P.
AU - Ruan, Jrjeng
AU - Lotz, Bernard
AU - Thomas, Edwin L.
AU - Hsiao, Benjamin S.
AU - Avila-Orta, Carlos A.
AU - Sics, Igors
AU - Cheng, Stephen Z.D.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by NSF (DMR-0516602). The 2D SAXS and WAXD research was carried out at the National Synchrotron Light Source in Brookhaven National Laboratory supported by the Department of Energy. We appreciate that the PerkinElmer Company set up a Pyris Diamond DSC in SZDC's laboratory.
PY - 2006/7/12
Y1 - 2006/7/12
N2 - A poly(ethylene oxide)-b-polystyrene (PEO-b-PS) diblock copolymer with a number average molecular weight of PEO blocks, Mn PEO=8.8 kg/mol, and a number average molecular weight of PS blocks, Mn PS=24.5 kg/mol, (volume fraction of the PEO blocks, fPEO, was 0.26) exhibited a hexagonal cylinder (HC) phase structure. Small angle X-ray scattering results showed that the PEO cylinder diameter was 13.3 nm, and the hexagonal lattice was a=25.1 nm. The cylinder diameter of this HC phase structure was virtually the same as that in the blend system constructed by a PEO-b-PS diblock copolymer (Mn PEO=8.7 kg/mol and Mn PS=9.2 kg/mol) and a PS homo-polymer (Mn PS=4.6 kg/mol) in which the fPEO was 0.32. The cylinder diameter in this blend sample was 13.7 nm and the hexagonal lattice was a=23.1 nm. Comparing crystal orientation and crystallization behaviors of this PEO-b-PS copolymer with the blend, it was found that the crystal orientation change with respect to crystallization temperature was almost identical. This is attributed to the fact that in both cases the PEO block tethering densities and confinement sizes are very similar. This indicates that when the Mn PS of PS homo-polymer is lower than the PS blocks, the PS homo-polymer is located inside of the PS matrix rather than at the interface between the PEO and PS in the HC phase structure. On the other hand, a substantial difference of crystallization behaviors was observed between these two samples. The PEO-b-PS copolymer exhibited much more retarded crystallization kinetics than that of the blend. Based on the small angle X-ray scattering results, it was found that in the blend sample, the HC phase structure was not as regularly ordered as that in the PEO-b-PS copolymer, and thus, the HC phase structure contained more defects in the blend. This led to a suggestion that the primary nucleation process in the confined crystallization is a defect-controlled process. The mean crystallite sizes were estimated by the Scherer equation, and the PEO crystal sizes are on the scale of the confined size.
AB - A poly(ethylene oxide)-b-polystyrene (PEO-b-PS) diblock copolymer with a number average molecular weight of PEO blocks, Mn PEO=8.8 kg/mol, and a number average molecular weight of PS blocks, Mn PS=24.5 kg/mol, (volume fraction of the PEO blocks, fPEO, was 0.26) exhibited a hexagonal cylinder (HC) phase structure. Small angle X-ray scattering results showed that the PEO cylinder diameter was 13.3 nm, and the hexagonal lattice was a=25.1 nm. The cylinder diameter of this HC phase structure was virtually the same as that in the blend system constructed by a PEO-b-PS diblock copolymer (Mn PEO=8.7 kg/mol and Mn PS=9.2 kg/mol) and a PS homo-polymer (Mn PS=4.6 kg/mol) in which the fPEO was 0.32. The cylinder diameter in this blend sample was 13.7 nm and the hexagonal lattice was a=23.1 nm. Comparing crystal orientation and crystallization behaviors of this PEO-b-PS copolymer with the blend, it was found that the crystal orientation change with respect to crystallization temperature was almost identical. This is attributed to the fact that in both cases the PEO block tethering densities and confinement sizes are very similar. This indicates that when the Mn PS of PS homo-polymer is lower than the PS blocks, the PS homo-polymer is located inside of the PS matrix rather than at the interface between the PEO and PS in the HC phase structure. On the other hand, a substantial difference of crystallization behaviors was observed between these two samples. The PEO-b-PS copolymer exhibited much more retarded crystallization kinetics than that of the blend. Based on the small angle X-ray scattering results, it was found that in the blend sample, the HC phase structure was not as regularly ordered as that in the PEO-b-PS copolymer, and thus, the HC phase structure contained more defects in the blend. This led to a suggestion that the primary nucleation process in the confined crystallization is a defect-controlled process. The mean crystallite sizes were estimated by the Scherer equation, and the PEO crystal sizes are on the scale of the confined size.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745878245&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745878245&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.06.129
DO - 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.06.129
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:33745878245
SN - 0032-3861
VL - 47
SP - 5457
EP - 5466
JO - polymer
JF - polymer
IS - 15
ER -