TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of Pregnancy Stress between in Vitro Fertilization/Embryo Transfer and Spontaneous Pregnancy in Women during Early Pregnancy
AU - Shih, Fen Fen
AU - Chen, Chung Hey
AU - Chiao, Chia Yi
AU - Li, Chi Rong
AU - Kuo, Pi Chao
AU - Lai, Te Jen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2015 Taiwan Nurses Association.
PY - 2015/12/1
Y1 - 2015/12/1
N2 - Background: Women who undergo in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer (IVF/ET) face complicated psychological stress and negative emotions, which may affect health during pregnancy and the development of the fetus. The current literature does not address the question of whether women who become pregnant spontaneously and women who undergo IVF face similar levels of pregnancy stress. Purpose: This study investigates the differences in pregnancy stress between women with spontaneous pregnancy and women with IVF/ET pregnancy living in central Taiwan during their first 20 weeks of pregnancy. Methods: A prospective, longitudinal design with repeated measures, generalized estimated equations model, Wilks' λ, and Bonferroni test was used. Purposive samples of 163 women who had undergone IVF/ET and of 94 women who had undergone spontaneous pregnancy were enrolled as participants. Pregnancy stress was measured using the Chinese version of the self-administered Pregnancy Stress Scale at the 9th, 12th, and 20th weeks of pregnancy. Results: The psychological stress experienced by IVF participants significantly increased with gestational week during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy (p <.01) but did not significantly increase in spontaneous-pregnancy participants. Gestational week was the main factor found to influence stress ratings for "identifying maternal role." "Altering body structure and body function" was the main factor found to influence pregnancy stress (p <.00). The method of becoming pregnant had no significant influence on pregnancy stress during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy (p >.05). Conclusions/Implications for Practice: The results of this study provide clinical evidence that IVF/ET does not cause more stress for women than spontaneous pregnancy. However, the intensity and trend of stresses differed between these two groups. These findings suggest that nurses should consider method of pregnancy when assessing the risk of stress in expectant mothers for each gestational week and when providing appropriate care and support.
AB - Background: Women who undergo in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer (IVF/ET) face complicated psychological stress and negative emotions, which may affect health during pregnancy and the development of the fetus. The current literature does not address the question of whether women who become pregnant spontaneously and women who undergo IVF face similar levels of pregnancy stress. Purpose: This study investigates the differences in pregnancy stress between women with spontaneous pregnancy and women with IVF/ET pregnancy living in central Taiwan during their first 20 weeks of pregnancy. Methods: A prospective, longitudinal design with repeated measures, generalized estimated equations model, Wilks' λ, and Bonferroni test was used. Purposive samples of 163 women who had undergone IVF/ET and of 94 women who had undergone spontaneous pregnancy were enrolled as participants. Pregnancy stress was measured using the Chinese version of the self-administered Pregnancy Stress Scale at the 9th, 12th, and 20th weeks of pregnancy. Results: The psychological stress experienced by IVF participants significantly increased with gestational week during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy (p <.01) but did not significantly increase in spontaneous-pregnancy participants. Gestational week was the main factor found to influence stress ratings for "identifying maternal role." "Altering body structure and body function" was the main factor found to influence pregnancy stress (p <.00). The method of becoming pregnant had no significant influence on pregnancy stress during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy (p >.05). Conclusions/Implications for Practice: The results of this study provide clinical evidence that IVF/ET does not cause more stress for women than spontaneous pregnancy. However, the intensity and trend of stresses differed between these two groups. These findings suggest that nurses should consider method of pregnancy when assessing the risk of stress in expectant mothers for each gestational week and when providing appropriate care and support.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948964290&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84948964290&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/JNR.0000000000000089
DO - 10.1097/JNR.0000000000000089
M3 - Article
C2 - 26562459
AN - SCOPUS:84948964290
SN - 1682-3141
VL - 23
SP - 280
EP - 289
JO - Journal of Nursing Research
JF - Journal of Nursing Research
IS - 4
ER -