Comparison of the electromyographic activation level and unilateral selectivity of erector spinae during different selected movements

Lan Yuen Guo, Yu Lin Wang, Yu Han Huang, Chich Haung Yang, Yi You Hou, I-Chen Hans, Yu Lin You

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For patients with scoliosis, core stabilization exercises may be beneficial in improving muscle strength and trunk dynamic control. However, few studies have examined whether the erector spinae (ES) activation status during unilateral spinal extensor strengthening meets the guideline for patients with spinal scoliosis. To determine ES activation and whether unilateral selectivity shows a significant difference in the three designated exercises, we recorded the ES activity of 20 university students during these exercises. All participants had normal spinal flexibility without a history of, or current, spinal disease. The three stabilization exercise movements were quadruped, prone, and modified prone. We detected the activation level of bilateral ES using electromyography and normalized it with the maximum voluntary contraction. We determined unilateral selectivity by the ratio of the activation level between active and nonactive ES. The results showed that the modified prone movement caused the greatest muscle activity up to 41.6% of maximum voluntary contraction among other muscles (P<0.05). The quadruped and modified prone movements showed greater differences in bilateral sides (P<0.05) with a unilateral selectivity of 1.72 and 1.67, respectively. However, there was no significant difference in unilateral selectivity between quadruped and modified prone movements. Quadruped movement may be more suitable than the other two only for unilateral back extensor training. Nevertheless, for improvement in muscle strength, modified prone movement could also be considered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)345-351
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Rehabilitation Research
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Dec 1

Fingerprint

Exercise
Muscle Strength
Scoliosis
Spinal Diseases
Muscles
Electromyography
Guidelines
Students

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Guo, Lan Yuen ; Wang, Yu Lin ; Huang, Yu Han ; Yang, Chich Haung ; Hou, Yi You ; Hans, I-Chen ; You, Yu Lin. / Comparison of the electromyographic activation level and unilateral selectivity of erector spinae during different selected movements. In: International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 2012 ; Vol. 35, No. 4. pp. 345-351.
@article{d4596843fcf94b6f83645d703197ac2c,
title = "Comparison of the electromyographic activation level and unilateral selectivity of erector spinae during different selected movements",
abstract = "For patients with scoliosis, core stabilization exercises may be beneficial in improving muscle strength and trunk dynamic control. However, few studies have examined whether the erector spinae (ES) activation status during unilateral spinal extensor strengthening meets the guideline for patients with spinal scoliosis. To determine ES activation and whether unilateral selectivity shows a significant difference in the three designated exercises, we recorded the ES activity of 20 university students during these exercises. All participants had normal spinal flexibility without a history of, or current, spinal disease. The three stabilization exercise movements were quadruped, prone, and modified prone. We detected the activation level of bilateral ES using electromyography and normalized it with the maximum voluntary contraction. We determined unilateral selectivity by the ratio of the activation level between active and nonactive ES. The results showed that the modified prone movement caused the greatest muscle activity up to 41.6{\%} of maximum voluntary contraction among other muscles (P<0.05). The quadruped and modified prone movements showed greater differences in bilateral sides (P<0.05) with a unilateral selectivity of 1.72 and 1.67, respectively. However, there was no significant difference in unilateral selectivity between quadruped and modified prone movements. Quadruped movement may be more suitable than the other two only for unilateral back extensor training. Nevertheless, for improvement in muscle strength, modified prone movement could also be considered.",
author = "Guo, {Lan Yuen} and Wang, {Yu Lin} and Huang, {Yu Han} and Yang, {Chich Haung} and Hou, {Yi You} and I-Chen Hans and You, {Yu Lin}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/MRR.0b013e32835641c0",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "345--351",
journal = "International Journal of Rehabilitation Research",
issn = "0342-5282",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

Comparison of the electromyographic activation level and unilateral selectivity of erector spinae during different selected movements. / Guo, Lan Yuen; Wang, Yu Lin; Huang, Yu Han; Yang, Chich Haung; Hou, Yi You; Hans, I-Chen; You, Yu Lin.

In: International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, Vol. 35, No. 4, 01.12.2012, p. 345-351.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the electromyographic activation level and unilateral selectivity of erector spinae during different selected movements

AU - Guo, Lan Yuen

AU - Wang, Yu Lin

AU - Huang, Yu Han

AU - Yang, Chich Haung

AU - Hou, Yi You

AU - Hans, I-Chen

AU - You, Yu Lin

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - For patients with scoliosis, core stabilization exercises may be beneficial in improving muscle strength and trunk dynamic control. However, few studies have examined whether the erector spinae (ES) activation status during unilateral spinal extensor strengthening meets the guideline for patients with spinal scoliosis. To determine ES activation and whether unilateral selectivity shows a significant difference in the three designated exercises, we recorded the ES activity of 20 university students during these exercises. All participants had normal spinal flexibility without a history of, or current, spinal disease. The three stabilization exercise movements were quadruped, prone, and modified prone. We detected the activation level of bilateral ES using electromyography and normalized it with the maximum voluntary contraction. We determined unilateral selectivity by the ratio of the activation level between active and nonactive ES. The results showed that the modified prone movement caused the greatest muscle activity up to 41.6% of maximum voluntary contraction among other muscles (P<0.05). The quadruped and modified prone movements showed greater differences in bilateral sides (P<0.05) with a unilateral selectivity of 1.72 and 1.67, respectively. However, there was no significant difference in unilateral selectivity between quadruped and modified prone movements. Quadruped movement may be more suitable than the other two only for unilateral back extensor training. Nevertheless, for improvement in muscle strength, modified prone movement could also be considered.

AB - For patients with scoliosis, core stabilization exercises may be beneficial in improving muscle strength and trunk dynamic control. However, few studies have examined whether the erector spinae (ES) activation status during unilateral spinal extensor strengthening meets the guideline for patients with spinal scoliosis. To determine ES activation and whether unilateral selectivity shows a significant difference in the three designated exercises, we recorded the ES activity of 20 university students during these exercises. All participants had normal spinal flexibility without a history of, or current, spinal disease. The three stabilization exercise movements were quadruped, prone, and modified prone. We detected the activation level of bilateral ES using electromyography and normalized it with the maximum voluntary contraction. We determined unilateral selectivity by the ratio of the activation level between active and nonactive ES. The results showed that the modified prone movement caused the greatest muscle activity up to 41.6% of maximum voluntary contraction among other muscles (P<0.05). The quadruped and modified prone movements showed greater differences in bilateral sides (P<0.05) with a unilateral selectivity of 1.72 and 1.67, respectively. However, there was no significant difference in unilateral selectivity between quadruped and modified prone movements. Quadruped movement may be more suitable than the other two only for unilateral back extensor training. Nevertheless, for improvement in muscle strength, modified prone movement could also be considered.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870058938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870058938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MRR.0b013e32835641c0

DO - 10.1097/MRR.0b013e32835641c0

M3 - Article

C2 - 22785046

AN - SCOPUS:84870058938

VL - 35

SP - 345

EP - 351

JO - International Journal of Rehabilitation Research

JF - International Journal of Rehabilitation Research

SN - 0342-5282

IS - 4

ER -