Comparison of the validity of the Chinese versions of the hypomania symptom checklist-32 (HCL-32) and mood disorder questionnaire (MDQ) for the detection of bipolar disorder in medicated patients with major depressive disorder

Chia Chi Chou, I. Hui Lee, Tzung Lieh Yeh, Kao Chin Chen, Po See Chen, Wei Tseng Chen, Ru Band Lu, Yen Kuang Yang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. The sensitivity and specificity of the Chinese versions of the Hypomania Symptom Checklist-32 (HCL-32) and Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) for detecting bipolar disorder in Taiwan were explored in this study. Methods In total, 59 participants who were initially diagnosed with unipolar depression were recruited from an outpatient clinic and were screened for bipolar disorder using the HCL-32 and MDQ; each participant also underwent a diagnostic interview based on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis disorder patients (SCID). Results. The results showed that the HCL-32 yielded the best combination of sensitivity (100%) and specificity (46.2%) at a cut-off point of 7/8, and the MDQ yielded the best combination of sensitivity (71.4%) and specificity (76.9%) at a cut-off point of 6/7. Conclusion. The results of our study demonstrate that the HCL-32 and MDQ are of reasonable validity to distinguish between bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder. However small sample size may limit generalization of the results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)132-137
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Jun

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of the validity of the Chinese versions of the hypomania symptom checklist-32 (HCL-32) and mood disorder questionnaire (MDQ) for the detection of bipolar disorder in medicated patients with major depressive disorder'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this