Competitor Rule Priming: Evidence for priming of task rules in task switching

Maayan Katzir, Bnaya Ori, ShuLan Hsieh, Nachshon Meiran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In task-switching experiments, participants switch between task rules, and each task rule describes how responses are mapped to stimulus information. Importantly, task rules do not pertain to any specific response but to all possible responses. This work examined the hypothesis that task rules, as wholes, rather than (just) specific responses are primed by their execution, such that, in the following trial, response conflicts are exacerbated when the competing responses are generated by these recently primed rules, and performance becomes relatively poor. This hypothesis was supported in two task-switching experiments and re-analyses of additional three published experiments, thus indicating Competitor Rule Priming. Importantly, the Competitor Rule-Priming effect was independent of response repetition vs. switch, suggesting that it reflects the priming of the entire task rule rather than the priming (or suppression) of specific responses. Moreover, this effect was obtained regardless of Backward Inhibition, suggesting these effects are unrelated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)446-462
Number of pages17
JournalPsychological Research
Volume79
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Task Switching
Priming
Experiment
Stimulus
Suppression
Reanalysis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Katzir, Maayan ; Ori, Bnaya ; Hsieh, ShuLan ; Meiran, Nachshon. / Competitor Rule Priming : Evidence for priming of task rules in task switching. In: Psychological Research. 2015 ; Vol. 79, No. 3. pp. 446-462.
@article{d6c2dafb8d8f4acdac6fbba8d40b7904,
title = "Competitor Rule Priming: Evidence for priming of task rules in task switching",
abstract = "In task-switching experiments, participants switch between task rules, and each task rule describes how responses are mapped to stimulus information. Importantly, task rules do not pertain to any specific response but to all possible responses. This work examined the hypothesis that task rules, as wholes, rather than (just) specific responses are primed by their execution, such that, in the following trial, response conflicts are exacerbated when the competing responses are generated by these recently primed rules, and performance becomes relatively poor. This hypothesis was supported in two task-switching experiments and re-analyses of additional three published experiments, thus indicating Competitor Rule Priming. Importantly, the Competitor Rule-Priming effect was independent of response repetition vs. switch, suggesting that it reflects the priming of the entire task rule rather than the priming (or suppression) of specific responses. Moreover, this effect was obtained regardless of Backward Inhibition, suggesting these effects are unrelated.",
author = "Maayan Katzir and Bnaya Ori and ShuLan Hsieh and Nachshon Meiran",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00426-014-0583-3",
language = "English",
volume = "79",
pages = "446--462",
journal = "Psychological Research",
issn = "0340-0727",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "3",

}

Competitor Rule Priming : Evidence for priming of task rules in task switching. / Katzir, Maayan; Ori, Bnaya; Hsieh, ShuLan; Meiran, Nachshon.

In: Psychological Research, Vol. 79, No. 3, 01.01.2015, p. 446-462.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Competitor Rule Priming

T2 - Evidence for priming of task rules in task switching

AU - Katzir, Maayan

AU - Ori, Bnaya

AU - Hsieh, ShuLan

AU - Meiran, Nachshon

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - In task-switching experiments, participants switch between task rules, and each task rule describes how responses are mapped to stimulus information. Importantly, task rules do not pertain to any specific response but to all possible responses. This work examined the hypothesis that task rules, as wholes, rather than (just) specific responses are primed by their execution, such that, in the following trial, response conflicts are exacerbated when the competing responses are generated by these recently primed rules, and performance becomes relatively poor. This hypothesis was supported in two task-switching experiments and re-analyses of additional three published experiments, thus indicating Competitor Rule Priming. Importantly, the Competitor Rule-Priming effect was independent of response repetition vs. switch, suggesting that it reflects the priming of the entire task rule rather than the priming (or suppression) of specific responses. Moreover, this effect was obtained regardless of Backward Inhibition, suggesting these effects are unrelated.

AB - In task-switching experiments, participants switch between task rules, and each task rule describes how responses are mapped to stimulus information. Importantly, task rules do not pertain to any specific response but to all possible responses. This work examined the hypothesis that task rules, as wholes, rather than (just) specific responses are primed by their execution, such that, in the following trial, response conflicts are exacerbated when the competing responses are generated by these recently primed rules, and performance becomes relatively poor. This hypothesis was supported in two task-switching experiments and re-analyses of additional three published experiments, thus indicating Competitor Rule Priming. Importantly, the Competitor Rule-Priming effect was independent of response repetition vs. switch, suggesting that it reflects the priming of the entire task rule rather than the priming (or suppression) of specific responses. Moreover, this effect was obtained regardless of Backward Inhibition, suggesting these effects are unrelated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939881794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939881794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00426-014-0583-3

DO - 10.1007/s00426-014-0583-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 24947758

AN - SCOPUS:84939881794

VL - 79

SP - 446

EP - 462

JO - Psychological Research

JF - Psychological Research

SN - 0340-0727

IS - 3

ER -