Corporate governance, SFAS 157 and cost of equity capital: evidence from US financial institutions

Hua-Wei Huang, Mai Dao, James M. Fornaro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examines the association between fair value measurements and the cost of equity capital under different fair value valuation methods, and assesses the impact of corporate governance on this relationship for US financial firms. We find that firms’ cost of equity capital is negatively associated with more verifiable fair value assets and positively related to less verifiable fair value assets. Furthermore, the positive association between less verifiable fair value assets and the cost of equity capital is mitigated under better corporate governance. The differential impact between more and less verifiable assets becomes smaller for firms with stronger governance. Our findings contribute to the ongoing debate on fair value regulation by investigating the economic consequences of adopting Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157) and the importance of audit committee financial expertise on fair value reporting. We also provide evidence on the importance of board independence, internal control strength, auditor industry specialists, and audit committee financial experts in fair value reporting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)141-177
Number of pages37
JournalReview of Quantitative Finance and Accounting
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Corporate governance
Financial institutions
Cost of equity capital
Fair value
Assets
Audit committee
Board independence
Economic consequences
Financial expertise
Valuation methods
Industry
Financial accounting standards
Auditors
Governance
Internal control

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Accounting
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Finance

Cite this

@article{cf1402b0c34846b883b4cf2cd13b2675,
title = "Corporate governance, SFAS 157 and cost of equity capital: evidence from US financial institutions",
abstract = "This study examines the association between fair value measurements and the cost of equity capital under different fair value valuation methods, and assesses the impact of corporate governance on this relationship for US financial firms. We find that firms’ cost of equity capital is negatively associated with more verifiable fair value assets and positively related to less verifiable fair value assets. Furthermore, the positive association between less verifiable fair value assets and the cost of equity capital is mitigated under better corporate governance. The differential impact between more and less verifiable assets becomes smaller for firms with stronger governance. Our findings contribute to the ongoing debate on fair value regulation by investigating the economic consequences of adopting Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157) and the importance of audit committee financial expertise on fair value reporting. We also provide evidence on the importance of board independence, internal control strength, auditor industry specialists, and audit committee financial experts in fair value reporting.",
author = "Hua-Wei Huang and Mai Dao and Fornaro, {James M.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11156-014-0465-1",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "141--177",
journal = "Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting",
issn = "0924-865X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

Corporate governance, SFAS 157 and cost of equity capital : evidence from US financial institutions. / Huang, Hua-Wei; Dao, Mai; Fornaro, James M.

In: Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Vol. 46, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 141-177.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corporate governance, SFAS 157 and cost of equity capital

T2 - evidence from US financial institutions

AU - Huang, Hua-Wei

AU - Dao, Mai

AU - Fornaro, James M.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - This study examines the association between fair value measurements and the cost of equity capital under different fair value valuation methods, and assesses the impact of corporate governance on this relationship for US financial firms. We find that firms’ cost of equity capital is negatively associated with more verifiable fair value assets and positively related to less verifiable fair value assets. Furthermore, the positive association between less verifiable fair value assets and the cost of equity capital is mitigated under better corporate governance. The differential impact between more and less verifiable assets becomes smaller for firms with stronger governance. Our findings contribute to the ongoing debate on fair value regulation by investigating the economic consequences of adopting Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157) and the importance of audit committee financial expertise on fair value reporting. We also provide evidence on the importance of board independence, internal control strength, auditor industry specialists, and audit committee financial experts in fair value reporting.

AB - This study examines the association between fair value measurements and the cost of equity capital under different fair value valuation methods, and assesses the impact of corporate governance on this relationship for US financial firms. We find that firms’ cost of equity capital is negatively associated with more verifiable fair value assets and positively related to less verifiable fair value assets. Furthermore, the positive association between less verifiable fair value assets and the cost of equity capital is mitigated under better corporate governance. The differential impact between more and less verifiable assets becomes smaller for firms with stronger governance. Our findings contribute to the ongoing debate on fair value regulation by investigating the economic consequences of adopting Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157) and the importance of audit committee financial expertise on fair value reporting. We also provide evidence on the importance of board independence, internal control strength, auditor industry specialists, and audit committee financial experts in fair value reporting.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953359938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953359938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11156-014-0465-1

DO - 10.1007/s11156-014-0465-1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84953359938

VL - 46

SP - 141

EP - 177

JO - Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting

JF - Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting

SN - 0924-865X

IS - 1

ER -