TY - JOUR
T1 - Corrigendum to “Role of the insula in rTMS response for depression” [J. Affect. Disord. 370 (2025) 538–546, (S0165032724019062), (10.1016/j.jad.2024.11.043)]
AU - Wu, Chien Lin
AU - Lu, Tsung Hua
AU - Chang, Wei Hung
AU - Wang, Tzu Yun
AU - Tseng, Huai Hsuan
AU - Yang, Yen Kuang
AU - Chen, Po See
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2025/11/1
Y1 - 2025/11/1
N2 - The authors regret that the following text should be revised. 1. One of the affiliation is uncompleted.Original Text: aDepartment of Psychiatry, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, Tainan, Taiwan Corrected Text: aDepartment of Psychiatry, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan 2. In the Introduction, fourth paragraph (starting with “Mounting evidence…”), the second reference should be revised as follows:Original Text: Drug-naïve MDD patients also show decreased insular connectivity, particularly between the right insula and brain regions such as the left middle frontal gyrus and superior temporal gyrus. These decreases in connectivity are correlated with duration and number of depressive episodes in the patients (Wang et al., 2018). Corrected Text: Drug-naïve MDD patients also show decreased insular connectivity, particularly between the right insula and brain regions such as the left middle frontal gyrus and superior temporal gyrus. These decreases in connectivity are correlated with duration and number of depressive episodes in the patients (Guo et al., 2015). Corrected Reference: Guo, W., Liu, F., Xiao, C., Zhang, Z., Liu, J., Yu, M., … & Zhao, J. (2015). Decreased insular connectivity in drug-naive major depressive disorder at rest. Journal of Affective Disorders, 179, 31–37. 3. In the discussion, first paragraph, the response rate has not been updated to match the text description and figure captions in the resultsOriginal Text: The respective response rates at weeks 4, 8 and 12 were 64.0 %, 66.7 % and 70.8 %, and remission rates were 40.0 %, 36.0 % and 44.0 %. Corrected Text: The respective response rates at weeks 4, 8 and 12 were 64.0 %, 64.0 % and 68.0 %, and remission rates were 40.0 %, 36.0 % and 44.0 %. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
AB - The authors regret that the following text should be revised. 1. One of the affiliation is uncompleted.Original Text: aDepartment of Psychiatry, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, Tainan, Taiwan Corrected Text: aDepartment of Psychiatry, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan 2. In the Introduction, fourth paragraph (starting with “Mounting evidence…”), the second reference should be revised as follows:Original Text: Drug-naïve MDD patients also show decreased insular connectivity, particularly between the right insula and brain regions such as the left middle frontal gyrus and superior temporal gyrus. These decreases in connectivity are correlated with duration and number of depressive episodes in the patients (Wang et al., 2018). Corrected Text: Drug-naïve MDD patients also show decreased insular connectivity, particularly between the right insula and brain regions such as the left middle frontal gyrus and superior temporal gyrus. These decreases in connectivity are correlated with duration and number of depressive episodes in the patients (Guo et al., 2015). Corrected Reference: Guo, W., Liu, F., Xiao, C., Zhang, Z., Liu, J., Yu, M., … & Zhao, J. (2015). Decreased insular connectivity in drug-naive major depressive disorder at rest. Journal of Affective Disorders, 179, 31–37. 3. In the discussion, first paragraph, the response rate has not been updated to match the text description and figure captions in the resultsOriginal Text: The respective response rates at weeks 4, 8 and 12 were 64.0 %, 66.7 % and 70.8 %, and remission rates were 40.0 %, 36.0 % and 44.0 %. Corrected Text: The respective response rates at weeks 4, 8 and 12 were 64.0 %, 64.0 % and 68.0 %, and remission rates were 40.0 %, 36.0 % and 44.0 %. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105006985905
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105006985905&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2025.119552
DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2025.119552
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 40460662
AN - SCOPUS:105006985905
SN - 0165-0327
VL - 388
JO - Journal of Affective Disorders
JF - Journal of Affective Disorders
M1 - 119552
ER -
