TY - JOUR
T1 - Dental treatments in patients with special needs provided by university medical center in Southern Taiwan
T2 - a retrospective study
AU - Yen, Yu-Fen
AU - Lin, Sheng-Hsiang
AU - Hsu, Hsiu Ming
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024.
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - Objectives: We perform special-need dental treatment at outpatient department (OPD), under general anesthesia (GA) when necessary, and provide domiciliary dental care. We aim to evaluate the profile and the characteristics of special needs patients (SNPs). Materials and methods: We consecutively enrolled 3117 SNPs from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2022. Eighty patients with rare or genetic diseases were excluded. Demographic data were retrospectively collected. Results: There were totally 3037 SNPs (mean age: 48.2 years; range, 1-100; male-to-female ratio, 1.5); 89.1% (n = 2705) SNPs received dental care at the OPD (OPD-SNPs), 7.9% (n = 239) received dental treatment under GA, and 3.0% (n = 93) received domiciliary dental care. Among those SNPs who received dental treatment under GA (n = 239), 91.2% (n = 218) were mental/intellectual disabled, and most underwent cavity filling (69.5%) and dental extractions (56.5%). OPD-SNPs with mental/intellectual disabilities (n = 1340) received significantly more items of dental treatment than those without (n = 1365). SNPs with more severe disabilities received more fluoride application and ultrasonic scaling (both p < 0.001, trend tests). Interestingly, among OPD-SNPs with mental/intellectual disabilities (n = 1340), more severe patients received more fluoride application (p < 0.001) and ultrasonic scaling (p < 0.001) but fewer root canal treatment (p = 0.007, trend test). Conclusions: GA benefited SNPs with more dental procedures, including invasive items. SNPs with mental/intellectual disabilities can tolerate more measures and SNPs with more severe mental/intellectual disabilities received more preventive measures but less invasive measures. Similarly, more severe SNPs with other disabilities received more preventive measures but not invasive measures. Clinical relevance: Our findings may provide useful information for special needs dentists and for doctor-patient communication.
AB - Objectives: We perform special-need dental treatment at outpatient department (OPD), under general anesthesia (GA) when necessary, and provide domiciliary dental care. We aim to evaluate the profile and the characteristics of special needs patients (SNPs). Materials and methods: We consecutively enrolled 3117 SNPs from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2022. Eighty patients with rare or genetic diseases were excluded. Demographic data were retrospectively collected. Results: There were totally 3037 SNPs (mean age: 48.2 years; range, 1-100; male-to-female ratio, 1.5); 89.1% (n = 2705) SNPs received dental care at the OPD (OPD-SNPs), 7.9% (n = 239) received dental treatment under GA, and 3.0% (n = 93) received domiciliary dental care. Among those SNPs who received dental treatment under GA (n = 239), 91.2% (n = 218) were mental/intellectual disabled, and most underwent cavity filling (69.5%) and dental extractions (56.5%). OPD-SNPs with mental/intellectual disabilities (n = 1340) received significantly more items of dental treatment than those without (n = 1365). SNPs with more severe disabilities received more fluoride application and ultrasonic scaling (both p < 0.001, trend tests). Interestingly, among OPD-SNPs with mental/intellectual disabilities (n = 1340), more severe patients received more fluoride application (p < 0.001) and ultrasonic scaling (p < 0.001) but fewer root canal treatment (p = 0.007, trend test). Conclusions: GA benefited SNPs with more dental procedures, including invasive items. SNPs with mental/intellectual disabilities can tolerate more measures and SNPs with more severe mental/intellectual disabilities received more preventive measures but less invasive measures. Similarly, more severe SNPs with other disabilities received more preventive measures but not invasive measures. Clinical relevance: Our findings may provide useful information for special needs dentists and for doctor-patient communication.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85196807572&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85196807572&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00784-024-05795-z
DO - 10.1007/s00784-024-05795-z
M3 - Review article
C2 - 38918223
AN - SCOPUS:85196807572
SN - 1432-6981
VL - 28
JO - Clinical Oral Investigations
JF - Clinical Oral Investigations
IS - 7
M1 - 398
ER -