TY - GEN
T1 - Development of an equipment failure identification expert system with multiple reasoning approaches
AU - Ho, Yeong Ho
AU - Wang, Huei Sen
AU - Wang, Hei Chia
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - The goal of the reasoning system in this study is to identify the most similar failure type or failure cases. As a user inputs all possible requirements (attributes), the inference engine of the system carries out its similarity assessment (inference approaches) and ranks rules or cases from the data base. Various inference approaches are chosen to find out the optimal method for the RBR and CBR system. The CBR system offers two types of inference methods which are hierarchical factors, flat factors without weight. For RBR system, there three types of inference methods are chosen, one is complete matched and the others are partial matched approaches which use the inference capability of CBR. The performance of developed system is then evaluated by using the real cases from China Steel Corporation (CSC). For the RBR system, performance is directly check the inferred order of the document ranking list. For the CBR system, the effectiveness of each inference method is evaluated by using "Recall", "Precision", and "F-Measure" approaches. From the test results, many recommendations are proposed.
AB - The goal of the reasoning system in this study is to identify the most similar failure type or failure cases. As a user inputs all possible requirements (attributes), the inference engine of the system carries out its similarity assessment (inference approaches) and ranks rules or cases from the data base. Various inference approaches are chosen to find out the optimal method for the RBR and CBR system. The CBR system offers two types of inference methods which are hierarchical factors, flat factors without weight. For RBR system, there three types of inference methods are chosen, one is complete matched and the others are partial matched approaches which use the inference capability of CBR. The performance of developed system is then evaluated by using the real cases from China Steel Corporation (CSC). For the RBR system, performance is directly check the inferred order of the document ranking list. For the CBR system, the effectiveness of each inference method is evaluated by using "Recall", "Precision", and "F-Measure" approaches. From the test results, many recommendations are proposed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891129725&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891129725&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.479-480.1001
DO - 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.479-480.1001
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84891129725
SN - 9783037859476
T3 - Applied Mechanics and Materials
SP - 1001
EP - 1005
BT - Applied Science and Precision Engineering Innovation
T2 - International Applied Science and Precision Engineering Conference 2013, ASPEC 2013
Y2 - 18 October 2013 through 22 October 2013
ER -