Development Rights: Regulating Vertical Urbanism in Taiwan

Mi Shih, Hsiu-Tzu Chang, Frank J. Popper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines the contested interaction between planning and private property by focusing on development rights: an important, yet under-studied, aspect of private ownership. Three regulatory approaches–a road-based rule, a FAR (floor area ratio)-based rule, and a TDR (transfer of development rights) mechanism–have influenced how planning in Taiwan has governed vertical development since the early twentieth century. We link them to three planning ideologies, the city pathological, the city rational, and the city neoliberal. We argue that regulation-ideology dynamics have led to greater power for the real estate sector in appropriating density rent in Taiwan.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)717-733
Number of pages17
JournalPlanning Theory and Practice
Volume19
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Oct 20

Fingerprint

Taiwan
ideology
planning
private property
great power
real estate
rent
twentieth century
Ideologies
ownership
road
regulation
interaction
city
rights

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Shih, Mi ; Chang, Hsiu-Tzu ; Popper, Frank J. / Development Rights : Regulating Vertical Urbanism in Taiwan. In: Planning Theory and Practice. 2018 ; Vol. 19, No. 5. pp. 717-733.
@article{078b5e967cf748a8927c7b30d71fe9c7,
title = "Development Rights: Regulating Vertical Urbanism in Taiwan",
abstract = "This article examines the contested interaction between planning and private property by focusing on development rights: an important, yet under-studied, aspect of private ownership. Three regulatory approaches–a road-based rule, a FAR (floor area ratio)-based rule, and a TDR (transfer of development rights) mechanism–have influenced how planning in Taiwan has governed vertical development since the early twentieth century. We link them to three planning ideologies, the city pathological, the city rational, and the city neoliberal. We argue that regulation-ideology dynamics have led to greater power for the real estate sector in appropriating density rent in Taiwan.",
author = "Mi Shih and Hsiu-Tzu Chang and Popper, {Frank J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1080/14649357.2018.1535085",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "717--733",
journal = "Planning Theory and Practice",
issn = "1464-9357",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "5",

}

Development Rights : Regulating Vertical Urbanism in Taiwan. / Shih, Mi; Chang, Hsiu-Tzu; Popper, Frank J.

In: Planning Theory and Practice, Vol. 19, No. 5, 20.10.2018, p. 717-733.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development Rights

T2 - Regulating Vertical Urbanism in Taiwan

AU - Shih, Mi

AU - Chang, Hsiu-Tzu

AU - Popper, Frank J.

PY - 2018/10/20

Y1 - 2018/10/20

N2 - This article examines the contested interaction between planning and private property by focusing on development rights: an important, yet under-studied, aspect of private ownership. Three regulatory approaches–a road-based rule, a FAR (floor area ratio)-based rule, and a TDR (transfer of development rights) mechanism–have influenced how planning in Taiwan has governed vertical development since the early twentieth century. We link them to three planning ideologies, the city pathological, the city rational, and the city neoliberal. We argue that regulation-ideology dynamics have led to greater power for the real estate sector in appropriating density rent in Taiwan.

AB - This article examines the contested interaction between planning and private property by focusing on development rights: an important, yet under-studied, aspect of private ownership. Three regulatory approaches–a road-based rule, a FAR (floor area ratio)-based rule, and a TDR (transfer of development rights) mechanism–have influenced how planning in Taiwan has governed vertical development since the early twentieth century. We link them to three planning ideologies, the city pathological, the city rational, and the city neoliberal. We argue that regulation-ideology dynamics have led to greater power for the real estate sector in appropriating density rent in Taiwan.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057544687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057544687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14649357.2018.1535085

DO - 10.1080/14649357.2018.1535085

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85057544687

VL - 19

SP - 717

EP - 733

JO - Planning Theory and Practice

JF - Planning Theory and Practice

SN - 1464-9357

IS - 5

ER -