TY - JOUR
T1 - Does Democracy Enhance Health? New Empirical Evidence 1900–2012
AU - Wang, Yi Ting
AU - Mechkova, Valeriya
AU - Andersson, Frida
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research project was supported by Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, Grant M13-0559:1, principal investigator (PI): Staffan I. Lindberg, V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; by Swedish Research Council, PI: Staffan I. Lindberg, V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Sweden & Jan Teorell, Department of Political Science, Lund University, Sweden; and by Knut & Alice Wallenberg Foundation to Wallenberg Academy Fellow Staffan I. Lindberg, V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; as well as by internal grants from the Vice-Chancellor’s office, the Dean of the College of social Sciences, and the Department of Political Science at University of Gothenburg. V-Dem project performed simulations and other computational tasks using resources provided by the Notre Dame Center for Research Computing (CRC) through the High Performance Computing section and the Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC) at the National Supercomputer Centre in Sweden. We specifically acknowledge the assistance of In-Saeng Suh at CRC and Johan Raber at SNIC in facilitating our use of their respective systems.
Funding Information:
We wish to thank Shih-hao Huang, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Bo Rothstein, Eitan Tzelgov, editors, and anonymous reviewers for their suggestions on earlier versions of this manuscript. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research project was supported by Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, Grant M13-0559:1, principal investigator (PI): Staffan I. Lindberg, V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; by Swedish Research Council, PI: Staffan I. Lindberg, V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Sweden & Jan Teorell, Department of Political Science, Lund University, Sweden; and by Knut & Alice Wallenberg Foundation to Wallenberg Academy Fellow Staffan I. Lindberg, V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; as well as by internal grants from the Vice-Chancellor?s office, the Dean of the College of social Sciences, and the Department of Political Science at University of Gothenburg. V-Dem project performed simulations and other computational tasks using resources provided by the Notre Dame Center for Research Computing (CRC) through the High Performance Computing section and the Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC) at the National Supercomputer Centre in Sweden. We specifically acknowledge the assistance of In-Saeng Suh at CRC and Johan Raber at SNIC in facilitating our use of their respective systems.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 University of Utah.
PY - 2019/9/1
Y1 - 2019/9/1
N2 - This study tests the relationship between democracy and population health. Some studies argue that democracies are more likely than authoritarian regimes to provide public goods and, thus, enhance health. However, recent research has challenged this argument and identified good governance as the crucial determinant of human development. Using a newly collected dataset covering 173 countries from 1900 to 2012, our analyses show that across models with various specifications, democratic elections have consistent effects on health outcomes even when other important factors, including good governance, are taken into account. There are some nuances in this relationship. First, the impact of electoral democracy tends to persist over time. Furthermore, the positive effects are particularly salient once the quality of elections has achieved a certain threshold. Our results also suggest that previous studies yielded mixed results in part because the commonly used governance indicators are only available for relatively short time periods, and the sample does not reflect the entire range of variation in measures of both democracy and governance.
AB - This study tests the relationship between democracy and population health. Some studies argue that democracies are more likely than authoritarian regimes to provide public goods and, thus, enhance health. However, recent research has challenged this argument and identified good governance as the crucial determinant of human development. Using a newly collected dataset covering 173 countries from 1900 to 2012, our analyses show that across models with various specifications, democratic elections have consistent effects on health outcomes even when other important factors, including good governance, are taken into account. There are some nuances in this relationship. First, the impact of electoral democracy tends to persist over time. Furthermore, the positive effects are particularly salient once the quality of elections has achieved a certain threshold. Our results also suggest that previous studies yielded mixed results in part because the commonly used governance indicators are only available for relatively short time periods, and the sample does not reflect the entire range of variation in measures of both democracy and governance.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060184857&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060184857&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1065912918798506
DO - 10.1177/1065912918798506
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85060184857
SN - 1065-9129
VL - 72
SP - 554
EP - 569
JO - Political Research Quarterly
JF - Political Research Quarterly
IS - 3
ER -