TY - JOUR
T1 - Does loading velocity affect failure strength after tendon repair?
AU - Parimi, Manoj
AU - Zhao, Chunfeng
AU - Thoreson, Andrew R.
AU - An, Kai Nan
AU - Amadio, Peter C.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by the NIH Grant T32 ( 5T32AR056950-03 ) and AR056950 .
PY - 2012/11/15
Y1 - 2012/11/15
N2 - Tensile testing of repaired tendons has been used to assess the efficacy of repair techniques. However, individuals flex and extend fingers at rates higher than those typically used for testing. This study characterized the effect of loading rate on the failure strength of repaired canine flexor tendons. Thirty-six canine flexor digitorum profundus tendons were lacerated, repaired, and tested at three displacement rates: 0.33. mm/s; 84. mm/s; and 590. mm/s. Peak force and stiffness of the repairs were evaluated. Peak force was significantly greater (p<0.05) for tendons distracted at 590. mm/s than at 0.33. mm/s. Crosshead stiffness was significantly greater for tendons distracted at 590. mm/s than at either 84. mm/s or 0.33. mm/s. The predominant failure mode was core suture knot untying. Distracting tendons at slow loading rates provides a conservative assessment of tendon repair strength. Additionally, an estimate of the failure load of this repair for different clinical events has been identified.
AB - Tensile testing of repaired tendons has been used to assess the efficacy of repair techniques. However, individuals flex and extend fingers at rates higher than those typically used for testing. This study characterized the effect of loading rate on the failure strength of repaired canine flexor tendons. Thirty-six canine flexor digitorum profundus tendons were lacerated, repaired, and tested at three displacement rates: 0.33. mm/s; 84. mm/s; and 590. mm/s. Peak force and stiffness of the repairs were evaluated. Peak force was significantly greater (p<0.05) for tendons distracted at 590. mm/s than at 0.33. mm/s. Crosshead stiffness was significantly greater for tendons distracted at 590. mm/s than at either 84. mm/s or 0.33. mm/s. The predominant failure mode was core suture knot untying. Distracting tendons at slow loading rates provides a conservative assessment of tendon repair strength. Additionally, an estimate of the failure load of this repair for different clinical events has been identified.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868349841&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84868349841&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.08.039
DO - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.08.039
M3 - Article
C2 - 22985475
AN - SCOPUS:84868349841
SN - 0021-9290
VL - 45
SP - 2939
EP - 2942
JO - Journal of Biomechanics
JF - Journal of Biomechanics
IS - 16
ER -