TY - JOUR
T1 - Does the type of criminal defense counsel affect case outcomes?. A natural experiment in Taiwan
AU - Huang, Kuo Chang
AU - Chen, Kong Pin
AU - Lin, Chang Ching
PY - 2010/6
Y1 - 2010/6
N2 - Taiwan's legal reform in 2003 provides an excellent natural experiment-like setting for empirical investigation. Using trial data from 2004 to 2007, we test whether there has been a systematic difference in trial outcomes between criminal defendants with different types of defense counsel, and examine relevant policy implications. Our study finds that while public defenders and government-contracted legal aid attorneys are about equally effective, they tend to adopt different litigation strategies which will in turn affect their clients' fates. Specifically, the defendants represented by public defenders tend to have higher conviction rates, but shorter sentences if they are convicted. These differences can be explained in term of the inherent differences in the institutional characters for the two types of counsel and the pecuniary incentives they face.
AB - Taiwan's legal reform in 2003 provides an excellent natural experiment-like setting for empirical investigation. Using trial data from 2004 to 2007, we test whether there has been a systematic difference in trial outcomes between criminal defendants with different types of defense counsel, and examine relevant policy implications. Our study finds that while public defenders and government-contracted legal aid attorneys are about equally effective, they tend to adopt different litigation strategies which will in turn affect their clients' fates. Specifically, the defendants represented by public defenders tend to have higher conviction rates, but shorter sentences if they are convicted. These differences can be explained in term of the inherent differences in the institutional characters for the two types of counsel and the pecuniary incentives they face.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952891348&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952891348&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.irle.2009.09.005
DO - 10.1016/j.irle.2009.09.005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:77952891348
SN - 0144-8188
VL - 30
SP - 113
EP - 127
JO - International Review of Law and Economics
JF - International Review of Law and Economics
IS - 2
ER -