Dual-task study of cognitive and postural interference

A preliminary investigation of the automatization deficit hypothesis of developmental co-ordination disorder

Chia-Liang Tsai, C. Y. Pan, Rong-Ju Cherng, S. K. Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether children with developmental co-ordination disorder and balance problem (DCD-BP) had greater problems than controls in performing a primary balance task while concurrently completing different cognitive tasks varying in oral or listening cognitive complexity, as well as to investigate the automatization deficit hypothesis of DCD-BP. Methods: Children with DCD-BP (n = 39), along with age-matched control counterparts (n = 39), were placed on automatic processing situation under dual-task conditions. All children were required to perform a primary task, five dual-task paradigms (oral counting task, auditory-verbal reaction task, auditory-choice reaction task, auditory-memory task and articulation alone) and an eyes-closed balancing task. Results: In the primary task condition, the differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.393) between children with and without DCD-BP. However, children with DCD-BP were significantly more impaired on three of five dual-task conditions (oral counting task: P = 0.003; auditory-verbal reaction task: P = 0.011; auditory-memory task: P = 0.041) compared with the single-task situation, with the exception of the auditory-choice reaction task (P = 0.471) and articulation alone (P = 0.067). Conclusions: These results suggest that children with DCD-BP were more cognitively dependant and may have an automatization deficit.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)551-560
Number of pages10
JournalChild: Care, Health and Development
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Jun 18

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@article{a462bcecc8824400970d3eb372c6f90b,
title = "Dual-task study of cognitive and postural interference: A preliminary investigation of the automatization deficit hypothesis of developmental co-ordination disorder",
abstract = "Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether children with developmental co-ordination disorder and balance problem (DCD-BP) had greater problems than controls in performing a primary balance task while concurrently completing different cognitive tasks varying in oral or listening cognitive complexity, as well as to investigate the automatization deficit hypothesis of DCD-BP. Methods: Children with DCD-BP (n = 39), along with age-matched control counterparts (n = 39), were placed on automatic processing situation under dual-task conditions. All children were required to perform a primary task, five dual-task paradigms (oral counting task, auditory-verbal reaction task, auditory-choice reaction task, auditory-memory task and articulation alone) and an eyes-closed balancing task. Results: In the primary task condition, the differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.393) between children with and without DCD-BP. However, children with DCD-BP were significantly more impaired on three of five dual-task conditions (oral counting task: P = 0.003; auditory-verbal reaction task: P = 0.011; auditory-memory task: P = 0.041) compared with the single-task situation, with the exception of the auditory-choice reaction task (P = 0.471) and articulation alone (P = 0.067). Conclusions: These results suggest that children with DCD-BP were more cognitively dependant and may have an automatization deficit.",
author = "Chia-Liang Tsai and Pan, {C. Y.} and Rong-Ju Cherng and Wu, {S. K.}",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.00974.x",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "551--560",
journal = "Child: Care, Health and Development",
issn = "0305-1862",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dual-task study of cognitive and postural interference

T2 - A preliminary investigation of the automatization deficit hypothesis of developmental co-ordination disorder

AU - Tsai, Chia-Liang

AU - Pan, C. Y.

AU - Cherng, Rong-Ju

AU - Wu, S. K.

PY - 2009/6/18

Y1 - 2009/6/18

N2 - Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether children with developmental co-ordination disorder and balance problem (DCD-BP) had greater problems than controls in performing a primary balance task while concurrently completing different cognitive tasks varying in oral or listening cognitive complexity, as well as to investigate the automatization deficit hypothesis of DCD-BP. Methods: Children with DCD-BP (n = 39), along with age-matched control counterparts (n = 39), were placed on automatic processing situation under dual-task conditions. All children were required to perform a primary task, five dual-task paradigms (oral counting task, auditory-verbal reaction task, auditory-choice reaction task, auditory-memory task and articulation alone) and an eyes-closed balancing task. Results: In the primary task condition, the differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.393) between children with and without DCD-BP. However, children with DCD-BP were significantly more impaired on three of five dual-task conditions (oral counting task: P = 0.003; auditory-verbal reaction task: P = 0.011; auditory-memory task: P = 0.041) compared with the single-task situation, with the exception of the auditory-choice reaction task (P = 0.471) and articulation alone (P = 0.067). Conclusions: These results suggest that children with DCD-BP were more cognitively dependant and may have an automatization deficit.

AB - Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether children with developmental co-ordination disorder and balance problem (DCD-BP) had greater problems than controls in performing a primary balance task while concurrently completing different cognitive tasks varying in oral or listening cognitive complexity, as well as to investigate the automatization deficit hypothesis of DCD-BP. Methods: Children with DCD-BP (n = 39), along with age-matched control counterparts (n = 39), were placed on automatic processing situation under dual-task conditions. All children were required to perform a primary task, five dual-task paradigms (oral counting task, auditory-verbal reaction task, auditory-choice reaction task, auditory-memory task and articulation alone) and an eyes-closed balancing task. Results: In the primary task condition, the differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.393) between children with and without DCD-BP. However, children with DCD-BP were significantly more impaired on three of five dual-task conditions (oral counting task: P = 0.003; auditory-verbal reaction task: P = 0.011; auditory-memory task: P = 0.041) compared with the single-task situation, with the exception of the auditory-choice reaction task (P = 0.471) and articulation alone (P = 0.067). Conclusions: These results suggest that children with DCD-BP were more cognitively dependant and may have an automatization deficit.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67049156746&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67049156746&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.00974.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.00974.x

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 551

EP - 560

JO - Child: Care, Health and Development

JF - Child: Care, Health and Development

SN - 0305-1862

IS - 4

ER -