Effect of Foreshocks of the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquakes on the Aso-Bridge Slope

C. Hung, B. C.B. Hsiung, K. H. Yang, L. Ge

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

Abstract

This paper presents an examination the Aso-bridge slope subjected to the foreshocks of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes. While the Aso-bridge slope was marginal stable in the absence of earthquake, it remained stable during the foreshocks that struck on April 14 and 15 2016, with magnitudes of 6.5 and 6.4 Mw, respectively. To validate that the slope did not fail during the foreshocks and the applicability of an enhanced FS method capable of determining the initiation time of co-seismic landslides, relationships between the Aso-bridge slope and the nearest recorded seismic signals, including the main-shock and the foreshocks, were investigated. It was found that the two foreshocks, having PGAs of 43.0 and 129.7 gal, were not strong enough to cause failure of the slope. They were not strong enough mainly because of the smaller magnitude as compared to the main-shock of 7.0 Mw with a PGA of 508.9 gal, leading to a significant difference in the PGAs. The study demonstrates that the enhanced FS method can be one efficient and practical alternative for determining large-scale co-seismic landslides.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)511-517
Number of pages7
JournalSpringer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering
Issue number204379
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Jan 1
Event2nd International Symposium on Asia Urban GeoEngineering, 2017 - Changsha, China
Duration: 2017 Nov 242017 Nov 27

Fingerprint

foreshock
Earthquakes
Landslides
earthquake
landslide
effect

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
  • Mechanics of Materials

Cite this

@article{7826e233f9c14a5da8026a69ebd0546d,
title = "Effect of Foreshocks of the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquakes on the Aso-Bridge Slope",
abstract = "This paper presents an examination the Aso-bridge slope subjected to the foreshocks of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes. While the Aso-bridge slope was marginal stable in the absence of earthquake, it remained stable during the foreshocks that struck on April 14 and 15 2016, with magnitudes of 6.5 and 6.4 Mw, respectively. To validate that the slope did not fail during the foreshocks and the applicability of an enhanced FS method capable of determining the initiation time of co-seismic landslides, relationships between the Aso-bridge slope and the nearest recorded seismic signals, including the main-shock and the foreshocks, were investigated. It was found that the two foreshocks, having PGAs of 43.0 and 129.7 gal, were not strong enough to cause failure of the slope. They were not strong enough mainly because of the smaller magnitude as compared to the main-shock of 7.0 Mw with a PGA of 508.9 gal, leading to a significant difference in the PGAs. The study demonstrates that the enhanced FS method can be one efficient and practical alternative for determining large-scale co-seismic landslides.",
author = "C. Hung and Hsiung, {B. C.B.} and Yang, {K. H.} and L. Ge",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-981-10-6632-0_39",
language = "English",
pages = "511--517",
journal = "Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering",
issn = "1866-8755",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "204379",

}

Effect of Foreshocks of the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquakes on the Aso-Bridge Slope. / Hung, C.; Hsiung, B. C.B.; Yang, K. H.; Ge, L.

In: Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering, No. 204379, 01.01.2018, p. 511-517.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of Foreshocks of the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquakes on the Aso-Bridge Slope

AU - Hung, C.

AU - Hsiung, B. C.B.

AU - Yang, K. H.

AU - Ge, L.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - This paper presents an examination the Aso-bridge slope subjected to the foreshocks of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes. While the Aso-bridge slope was marginal stable in the absence of earthquake, it remained stable during the foreshocks that struck on April 14 and 15 2016, with magnitudes of 6.5 and 6.4 Mw, respectively. To validate that the slope did not fail during the foreshocks and the applicability of an enhanced FS method capable of determining the initiation time of co-seismic landslides, relationships between the Aso-bridge slope and the nearest recorded seismic signals, including the main-shock and the foreshocks, were investigated. It was found that the two foreshocks, having PGAs of 43.0 and 129.7 gal, were not strong enough to cause failure of the slope. They were not strong enough mainly because of the smaller magnitude as compared to the main-shock of 7.0 Mw with a PGA of 508.9 gal, leading to a significant difference in the PGAs. The study demonstrates that the enhanced FS method can be one efficient and practical alternative for determining large-scale co-seismic landslides.

AB - This paper presents an examination the Aso-bridge slope subjected to the foreshocks of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes. While the Aso-bridge slope was marginal stable in the absence of earthquake, it remained stable during the foreshocks that struck on April 14 and 15 2016, with magnitudes of 6.5 and 6.4 Mw, respectively. To validate that the slope did not fail during the foreshocks and the applicability of an enhanced FS method capable of determining the initiation time of co-seismic landslides, relationships between the Aso-bridge slope and the nearest recorded seismic signals, including the main-shock and the foreshocks, were investigated. It was found that the two foreshocks, having PGAs of 43.0 and 129.7 gal, were not strong enough to cause failure of the slope. They were not strong enough mainly because of the smaller magnitude as compared to the main-shock of 7.0 Mw with a PGA of 508.9 gal, leading to a significant difference in the PGAs. The study demonstrates that the enhanced FS method can be one efficient and practical alternative for determining large-scale co-seismic landslides.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034235553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034235553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-981-10-6632-0_39

DO - 10.1007/978-981-10-6632-0_39

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:85034235553

SP - 511

EP - 517

JO - Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering

JF - Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering

SN - 1866-8755

IS - 204379

ER -