TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of stem length on prosthetic radial head micromotion
AU - Shukla, Dave R.
AU - Fitzsimmons, James S.
AU - An, Kai Nan
AU - O'Driscoll, Shawn W.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by the Mayo Foundation . The prosthetic components were provided by Acumed. One of the authors (S.O.D.) and the Mayo Foundation receive royalties from commercial entities related to the subject of this article (Tornier and Acumed). This study was not supported by any outside funding or grants. The authors, their immediate families, and any research foundations with which they are affiliated have not received any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article.
PY - 2012/11
Y1 - 2012/11
N2 - Background: Osteointegration of press-fit radial head implants is achieved by limiting micromotion between the stem and bone. Aspects of stem design that contribute to the enhancement of initial stability (ie, stem diameter and surface coating) have been investigated. The importance of total prosthesis length and level of the neck cut has not been examined. Methods: Cadaveric radii were implanted with cementless, porous-coated radial head stems. We resected 10, 12, 15, 20, and 25 mm of radial neck in each specimen. Stem-bone micromotion was measured after each cut. Values were expressed in terms of quotients (cantilever quotient). Results: A threshold effect was observed at 15 mm of neck resection (cantilever quotient, 0.4), with a significant increase in micromotion observed between 12 mm (40 ± 10 μm) and 15 mm (80 ± 25 μm). A cantilever quotient of 0.35 or less predicted implant stability, whereas implants with a cantilever quotient of 0.6 or more were unstable. In between, the stems were "at risk" of instability. Conclusion: Initial stem stability of a porous-coated, cementless radial head implant is dependent on length of the implant stem within bone and the level of the cut (amount of bone resected). Stability may be compromised by an implant with a combined head and neck length that is too long compared with the stem length within the canal. We found a critical ratio of exposed prosthesis to total implant length (cantilever quotient of 0.4), which puts the prosthesis at risk of inadequate initial stability. These data carry important implications for implant design and use.
AB - Background: Osteointegration of press-fit radial head implants is achieved by limiting micromotion between the stem and bone. Aspects of stem design that contribute to the enhancement of initial stability (ie, stem diameter and surface coating) have been investigated. The importance of total prosthesis length and level of the neck cut has not been examined. Methods: Cadaveric radii were implanted with cementless, porous-coated radial head stems. We resected 10, 12, 15, 20, and 25 mm of radial neck in each specimen. Stem-bone micromotion was measured after each cut. Values were expressed in terms of quotients (cantilever quotient). Results: A threshold effect was observed at 15 mm of neck resection (cantilever quotient, 0.4), with a significant increase in micromotion observed between 12 mm (40 ± 10 μm) and 15 mm (80 ± 25 μm). A cantilever quotient of 0.35 or less predicted implant stability, whereas implants with a cantilever quotient of 0.6 or more were unstable. In between, the stems were "at risk" of instability. Conclusion: Initial stem stability of a porous-coated, cementless radial head implant is dependent on length of the implant stem within bone and the level of the cut (amount of bone resected). Stability may be compromised by an implant with a combined head and neck length that is too long compared with the stem length within the canal. We found a critical ratio of exposed prosthesis to total implant length (cantilever quotient of 0.4), which puts the prosthesis at risk of inadequate initial stability. These data carry important implications for implant design and use.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867722794&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867722794&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.025
DO - 10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.025
M3 - Article
C2 - 22445160
AN - SCOPUS:84867722794
SN - 1058-2746
VL - 21
SP - 1559
EP - 1564
JO - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
JF - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
IS - 11
ER -