Effects of the type and direction of support surface perturbation on postural responses

Chiung Ling Chen, Shu Zon Lou, Hong Wen Wu, Shyi Kuen Wu, Kwok Tak Yeung, Fong-chin Su

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Postural control is organized around a task goal. The two most frequently used types of tasks for postural control research are translational (translation along the anterior-posterior axis) and rotational (rotation in sagittal plane) surface perturbations. These types of perturbations rotate the ankle joint, causing different magnitudes and directions of body sway. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the type (translation vs. rotation) and direction (forward/toe up vs. backward/toe down) of the perturbation on postural responses. Method. Nineteen healthy subjects were tested with four perturbations, i.e., forward and backward translation and toe up and toe down rotation. The onset latency and magnitude of muscle activations, angular changes, and COM displacements were measured. In addition, the kinematic data were divided into two phases. The initial phase reflected the balance disturbance induced by the platform movement, and the reversal phase reflected the balance reaction. Results: The results showed that, in the initial phase, rotational perturbation induced earlier ankle movement and faster and larger vertical COM displacement, while translational and forward/toe up perturbations induced larger head and trunk angular change and faster and larger horizontal COM displacement. In the reversal phase, balance reaction was attained by multi-joint movements. Translational and forward/toe up perturbations that induced larger upper body instability evoked faster muscle activation as well as faster and larger hip or knee joint movements. Conclusions: These findings provide insights into an appropriate support surface perturbation for the evaluation and training of balance.

Original languageEnglish
Article number50
JournalJournal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Apr 7

Fingerprint

Toes
Muscles
Ankle Joint
Hip Joint
Knee Joint
Biomechanical Phenomena
Ankle
Direction compound
Healthy Volunteers
Joints
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Chen, Chiung Ling ; Lou, Shu Zon ; Wu, Hong Wen ; Wu, Shyi Kuen ; Yeung, Kwok Tak ; Su, Fong-chin. / Effects of the type and direction of support surface perturbation on postural responses. In: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2014 ; Vol. 11, No. 1.
@article{ae320fbac6d34b3e8f22b809756a41c9,
title = "Effects of the type and direction of support surface perturbation on postural responses",
abstract = "Background: Postural control is organized around a task goal. The two most frequently used types of tasks for postural control research are translational (translation along the anterior-posterior axis) and rotational (rotation in sagittal plane) surface perturbations. These types of perturbations rotate the ankle joint, causing different magnitudes and directions of body sway. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the type (translation vs. rotation) and direction (forward/toe up vs. backward/toe down) of the perturbation on postural responses. Method. Nineteen healthy subjects were tested with four perturbations, i.e., forward and backward translation and toe up and toe down rotation. The onset latency and magnitude of muscle activations, angular changes, and COM displacements were measured. In addition, the kinematic data were divided into two phases. The initial phase reflected the balance disturbance induced by the platform movement, and the reversal phase reflected the balance reaction. Results: The results showed that, in the initial phase, rotational perturbation induced earlier ankle movement and faster and larger vertical COM displacement, while translational and forward/toe up perturbations induced larger head and trunk angular change and faster and larger horizontal COM displacement. In the reversal phase, balance reaction was attained by multi-joint movements. Translational and forward/toe up perturbations that induced larger upper body instability evoked faster muscle activation as well as faster and larger hip or knee joint movements. Conclusions: These findings provide insights into an appropriate support surface perturbation for the evaluation and training of balance.",
author = "Chen, {Chiung Ling} and Lou, {Shu Zon} and Wu, {Hong Wen} and Wu, {Shyi Kuen} and Yeung, {Kwok Tak} and Fong-chin Su",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1186/1743-0003-11-50",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation",
issn = "1743-0003",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

Effects of the type and direction of support surface perturbation on postural responses. / Chen, Chiung Ling; Lou, Shu Zon; Wu, Hong Wen; Wu, Shyi Kuen; Yeung, Kwok Tak; Su, Fong-chin.

In: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, Vol. 11, No. 1, 50, 07.04.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of the type and direction of support surface perturbation on postural responses

AU - Chen, Chiung Ling

AU - Lou, Shu Zon

AU - Wu, Hong Wen

AU - Wu, Shyi Kuen

AU - Yeung, Kwok Tak

AU - Su, Fong-chin

PY - 2014/4/7

Y1 - 2014/4/7

N2 - Background: Postural control is organized around a task goal. The two most frequently used types of tasks for postural control research are translational (translation along the anterior-posterior axis) and rotational (rotation in sagittal plane) surface perturbations. These types of perturbations rotate the ankle joint, causing different magnitudes and directions of body sway. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the type (translation vs. rotation) and direction (forward/toe up vs. backward/toe down) of the perturbation on postural responses. Method. Nineteen healthy subjects were tested with four perturbations, i.e., forward and backward translation and toe up and toe down rotation. The onset latency and magnitude of muscle activations, angular changes, and COM displacements were measured. In addition, the kinematic data were divided into two phases. The initial phase reflected the balance disturbance induced by the platform movement, and the reversal phase reflected the balance reaction. Results: The results showed that, in the initial phase, rotational perturbation induced earlier ankle movement and faster and larger vertical COM displacement, while translational and forward/toe up perturbations induced larger head and trunk angular change and faster and larger horizontal COM displacement. In the reversal phase, balance reaction was attained by multi-joint movements. Translational and forward/toe up perturbations that induced larger upper body instability evoked faster muscle activation as well as faster and larger hip or knee joint movements. Conclusions: These findings provide insights into an appropriate support surface perturbation for the evaluation and training of balance.

AB - Background: Postural control is organized around a task goal. The two most frequently used types of tasks for postural control research are translational (translation along the anterior-posterior axis) and rotational (rotation in sagittal plane) surface perturbations. These types of perturbations rotate the ankle joint, causing different magnitudes and directions of body sway. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the type (translation vs. rotation) and direction (forward/toe up vs. backward/toe down) of the perturbation on postural responses. Method. Nineteen healthy subjects were tested with four perturbations, i.e., forward and backward translation and toe up and toe down rotation. The onset latency and magnitude of muscle activations, angular changes, and COM displacements were measured. In addition, the kinematic data were divided into two phases. The initial phase reflected the balance disturbance induced by the platform movement, and the reversal phase reflected the balance reaction. Results: The results showed that, in the initial phase, rotational perturbation induced earlier ankle movement and faster and larger vertical COM displacement, while translational and forward/toe up perturbations induced larger head and trunk angular change and faster and larger horizontal COM displacement. In the reversal phase, balance reaction was attained by multi-joint movements. Translational and forward/toe up perturbations that induced larger upper body instability evoked faster muscle activation as well as faster and larger hip or knee joint movements. Conclusions: These findings provide insights into an appropriate support surface perturbation for the evaluation and training of balance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899554947&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899554947&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1743-0003-11-50

DO - 10.1186/1743-0003-11-50

M3 - Article

VL - 11

JO - Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

SN - 1743-0003

IS - 1

M1 - 50

ER -