TY - JOUR
T1 - Electric-field-induced submicrosecond resistive switching
AU - Das, N.
AU - Tsui, S.
AU - Xue, Y. Y.
AU - Wang, Y. Q.
AU - Chu, C. W.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2008/12/1
Y1 - 2008/12/1
N2 - Electric-field-induced resistive switching in metal-oxide interfaces has attracted extensive recent interest. While many agree that lattice defects play a key role, details of the physical processes are far from clear. There is debate, for example, regarding whether the electromigration of pre-existing point defects or the field-created larger lattice defects dominates the switch. We investigate several Ag-Pr0.7 Ca0.3 MnO3 samples exhibiting either submicrosecond fast switching or slow quasistatic dc switching. It is found that the carrier trapping potentials are very different for the pre-existing point defects associated with doping (and/or electromigration) and for the defects responsible for the submicrosecond fast switching. Creation/removal of the defects with more severe lattice distortions and spatial spreading (trapping potential ≥0.35 eV), therefore, should be the dominating mechanism during submicrosecond switching. On the other hand, the shallow defects (trapping potential ≪0.2 eV) associated with doping/annealing are most likely responsible for the resistance hysteresis (slow switch) during quasistatic voltage sweep.
AB - Electric-field-induced resistive switching in metal-oxide interfaces has attracted extensive recent interest. While many agree that lattice defects play a key role, details of the physical processes are far from clear. There is debate, for example, regarding whether the electromigration of pre-existing point defects or the field-created larger lattice defects dominates the switch. We investigate several Ag-Pr0.7 Ca0.3 MnO3 samples exhibiting either submicrosecond fast switching or slow quasistatic dc switching. It is found that the carrier trapping potentials are very different for the pre-existing point defects associated with doping (and/or electromigration) and for the defects responsible for the submicrosecond fast switching. Creation/removal of the defects with more severe lattice distortions and spatial spreading (trapping potential ≥0.35 eV), therefore, should be the dominating mechanism during submicrosecond switching. On the other hand, the shallow defects (trapping potential ≪0.2 eV) associated with doping/annealing are most likely responsible for the resistance hysteresis (slow switch) during quasistatic voltage sweep.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58149239895&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58149239895&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.235418
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.235418
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:58149239895
SN - 1098-0121
VL - 78
JO - Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics
JF - Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics
IS - 23
M1 - 235418
ER -