TY - JOUR
T1 - Electrophysiological evidence of the adaptive task-set inhibition in task switching
AU - Hsieh, Shulan
AU - Liu, Hanjung
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank the National Science Council of the Republic of China, Taiwan for financially supporting this research under Contract No. NSC95-2413-H-194-022-MY3.
Copyright:
Copyright 2011 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2009/2/19
Y1 - 2009/2/19
N2 - The present study aimed to employ an electrophysiological approach to evaluate the adaptive task-set inhibition hypothesis. According to the adaptive task-set inhibition hypothesis, task switching should depend on whether the previous trial is univalent or bivalent. This study employed a pairwise task-switching paradigm. We focused on the second stimulus of a task pair and examined whether its event-related potential (ERP) can be modulated as a function of the preceding stimulus type (i.e., whether the first stimulus of a task pair is univalent or bivalent). Although the reaction time (RT) data in this study indicated that the previous stimulus type did not affect the subsequent stimulus' performance, we found that the Stimulus 2-locked ERP data could be modulated as a function of the Stimulus 1 type - univalent or bivalent. More importantly, the effect of Task 2 transition occurred only when the Stimulus 1 type was bivalent, as seen in the P3b time-range ERP modulation. Therefore, the current ERP results provide evidence of the adaptive task-set inhibition.
AB - The present study aimed to employ an electrophysiological approach to evaluate the adaptive task-set inhibition hypothesis. According to the adaptive task-set inhibition hypothesis, task switching should depend on whether the previous trial is univalent or bivalent. This study employed a pairwise task-switching paradigm. We focused on the second stimulus of a task pair and examined whether its event-related potential (ERP) can be modulated as a function of the preceding stimulus type (i.e., whether the first stimulus of a task pair is univalent or bivalent). Although the reaction time (RT) data in this study indicated that the previous stimulus type did not affect the subsequent stimulus' performance, we found that the Stimulus 2-locked ERP data could be modulated as a function of the Stimulus 1 type - univalent or bivalent. More importantly, the effect of Task 2 transition occurred only when the Stimulus 1 type was bivalent, as seen in the P3b time-range ERP modulation. Therefore, the current ERP results provide evidence of the adaptive task-set inhibition.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=59249091101&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=59249091101&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.11.103
DO - 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.11.103
M3 - Article
C2 - 19111680
AN - SCOPUS:59249091101
SN - 0006-8993
VL - 1255
SP - 122
EP - 131
JO - Brain Research
JF - Brain Research
ER -