Evaluating environmental performance using new process capability indices for autocorrelated data

Jeh-Nan Pan, Chung-I Li, F. Y. Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Traditionally, the process capability index is developed by assuming that the process output data are independent and follow normal distribution. However, in most environmental cases, the process data are autocorrelated. The autocorrelated process, if unrecognized as an independent process, can lead to erroneous decision making and unnecessary quality loss. In this paper, three new capability indices with unbiased estimators are proposed to relieve the independence assumption for the-nominal-the-best and the-smaller-the-better cases. Furthermore, we use mean squared error (MSE) and mean absolute percent error (MAPE) to compare the accuracy of our proposed indices to previous autocorrelated indices. The results show that our proposed capability indices outperform the predecessors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6369-6384
Number of pages16
JournalEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessment
Volume186
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Oct 1

Fingerprint

Normal distribution
Decision making
decision making
index
environmental performance
distribution
loss

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Pollution
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

@article{9097582d886e4701958cd637b8f8581e,
title = "Evaluating environmental performance using new process capability indices for autocorrelated data",
abstract = "Traditionally, the process capability index is developed by assuming that the process output data are independent and follow normal distribution. However, in most environmental cases, the process data are autocorrelated. The autocorrelated process, if unrecognized as an independent process, can lead to erroneous decision making and unnecessary quality loss. In this paper, three new capability indices with unbiased estimators are proposed to relieve the independence assumption for the-nominal-the-best and the-smaller-the-better cases. Furthermore, we use mean squared error (MSE) and mean absolute percent error (MAPE) to compare the accuracy of our proposed indices to previous autocorrelated indices. The results show that our proposed capability indices outperform the predecessors.",
author = "Jeh-Nan Pan and Chung-I Li and Chen, {F. Y.}",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10661-014-3861-z",
language = "English",
volume = "186",
pages = "6369--6384",
journal = "Environmental Monitoring and Assessment",
issn = "0167-6369",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "10",

}

Evaluating environmental performance using new process capability indices for autocorrelated data. / Pan, Jeh-Nan; Li, Chung-I; Chen, F. Y.

In: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, Vol. 186, No. 10, 01.10.2014, p. 6369-6384.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating environmental performance using new process capability indices for autocorrelated data

AU - Pan, Jeh-Nan

AU - Li, Chung-I

AU - Chen, F. Y.

PY - 2014/10/1

Y1 - 2014/10/1

N2 - Traditionally, the process capability index is developed by assuming that the process output data are independent and follow normal distribution. However, in most environmental cases, the process data are autocorrelated. The autocorrelated process, if unrecognized as an independent process, can lead to erroneous decision making and unnecessary quality loss. In this paper, three new capability indices with unbiased estimators are proposed to relieve the independence assumption for the-nominal-the-best and the-smaller-the-better cases. Furthermore, we use mean squared error (MSE) and mean absolute percent error (MAPE) to compare the accuracy of our proposed indices to previous autocorrelated indices. The results show that our proposed capability indices outperform the predecessors.

AB - Traditionally, the process capability index is developed by assuming that the process output data are independent and follow normal distribution. However, in most environmental cases, the process data are autocorrelated. The autocorrelated process, if unrecognized as an independent process, can lead to erroneous decision making and unnecessary quality loss. In this paper, three new capability indices with unbiased estimators are proposed to relieve the independence assumption for the-nominal-the-best and the-smaller-the-better cases. Furthermore, we use mean squared error (MSE) and mean absolute percent error (MAPE) to compare the accuracy of our proposed indices to previous autocorrelated indices. The results show that our proposed capability indices outperform the predecessors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921648679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84921648679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10661-014-3861-z

DO - 10.1007/s10661-014-3861-z

M3 - Article

VL - 186

SP - 6369

EP - 6384

JO - Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

JF - Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

SN - 0167-6369

IS - 10

ER -