TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of an inpatient fall risk screening tool to identify the most critical fall risk factors in inpatients
AU - Hou, Wen Hsuan
AU - Kang, Chun Mei
AU - Ho, Mu Hsing
AU - Kuo, Jessie Ming Chuan
AU - Chen, Hsiao Lien
AU - Chang, Wen Yin
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 103-2314-B- 038-049-MY3). The authors would like to thank Cathay General Hospital for the assisting in data collection. The authors are also indebted to the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 103-2314-B- 038-049-MY3) for the financial support provided for this research.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2017/3/1
Y1 - 2017/3/1
N2 - Aims and objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of the inpatient fall risk screening tool and to identify the most critical fall risk factors in inpatients. Background: Variations exist in several screening tools applied in acute care hospitals for examining risk factors for falls and identifying high-risk inpatients. Design: Secondary data analysis. Methods: A subset of inpatient data for the period from June 2011–June 2014 was extracted from the nursing information system and adverse event reporting system of an 818-bed teaching medical centre in Taipei. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and logistic regression analysis. Results: During the study period, 205 fallers and 37,232 nonfallers were identified. The results revealed that the inpatient fall risk screening tool (cut-off point of ≥3) had a low sensitivity level (60%), satisfactory specificity (87%), a positive predictive value of 2·0% and a negative predictive value of 99%. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0·805 (sensitivity, 71·8%; specificity, 78%). To increase the sensitivity values, the Youden index suggests at least 1·5 points to be the most suitable cut-off point for the inpatient fall risk screening tool. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a considerably increased fall risk in patients with impaired balance and impaired elimination. The fall risk factor was also significantly associated with days of hospital stay and with admission to surgical wards. Conclusions: The findings can raise awareness about the two most critical risk factors for falls among future clinical nurses and other healthcare professionals and thus facilitate the development of fall prevention interventions. Relevance to clinical practice: This study highlights the needs for redefining the cut-off points of the inpatient fall risk screening tool to effectively identify inpatients at a high risk of falls. Furthermore, inpatients with impaired balance and impaired elimination should be closely monitored by nurses to prevent falling during hospitalisations.
AB - Aims and objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of the inpatient fall risk screening tool and to identify the most critical fall risk factors in inpatients. Background: Variations exist in several screening tools applied in acute care hospitals for examining risk factors for falls and identifying high-risk inpatients. Design: Secondary data analysis. Methods: A subset of inpatient data for the period from June 2011–June 2014 was extracted from the nursing information system and adverse event reporting system of an 818-bed teaching medical centre in Taipei. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and logistic regression analysis. Results: During the study period, 205 fallers and 37,232 nonfallers were identified. The results revealed that the inpatient fall risk screening tool (cut-off point of ≥3) had a low sensitivity level (60%), satisfactory specificity (87%), a positive predictive value of 2·0% and a negative predictive value of 99%. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0·805 (sensitivity, 71·8%; specificity, 78%). To increase the sensitivity values, the Youden index suggests at least 1·5 points to be the most suitable cut-off point for the inpatient fall risk screening tool. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a considerably increased fall risk in patients with impaired balance and impaired elimination. The fall risk factor was also significantly associated with days of hospital stay and with admission to surgical wards. Conclusions: The findings can raise awareness about the two most critical risk factors for falls among future clinical nurses and other healthcare professionals and thus facilitate the development of fall prevention interventions. Relevance to clinical practice: This study highlights the needs for redefining the cut-off points of the inpatient fall risk screening tool to effectively identify inpatients at a high risk of falls. Furthermore, inpatients with impaired balance and impaired elimination should be closely monitored by nurses to prevent falling during hospitalisations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006320675&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006320675&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jocn.13510
DO - 10.1111/jocn.13510
M3 - Article
C2 - 27533486
AN - SCOPUS:85006320675
SN - 0962-1067
VL - 26
SP - 698
EP - 706
JO - Journal of Clinical Nursing
JF - Journal of Clinical Nursing
IS - 5-6
ER -