TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of propane explosion with applied water mist
AU - Li, Ping Jung
AU - Chen, Chao Shi
AU - Weng, Cheng Yu
AU - Ho, Hsin Hsiu
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank Occupational Safety, Health, and Medicine Research Center of Chang Jung Christian University for supplying the research place and equipment to make this research possible. The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - This article discusses the overpressure of a gas explosion and the performance of applying water mist for explosion suppression. According to the experimental results, the larger the opening area, the more difficult it is for pressure to accumulate, resulting in lower overpressure of a gas explosion. When the opening was opened under a high air speed environment, the amount of entrained air was greater. Consequently, the occurrence time of the explosion was shorter than at a low air speed. Despite the water mist nozzle being installed outside the enclosure, a propane gas explosion still occurred regardless of the amount of water mist used, failing to suppress the explosion. However, the water mist nozzle installed inside the enclosure supplied an adequate amount of water mist that could wash a part of the propane, resulting in the fuel concentration dropping below the lower explosion limit, hindering the occurrence of an explosion.
AB - This article discusses the overpressure of a gas explosion and the performance of applying water mist for explosion suppression. According to the experimental results, the larger the opening area, the more difficult it is for pressure to accumulate, resulting in lower overpressure of a gas explosion. When the opening was opened under a high air speed environment, the amount of entrained air was greater. Consequently, the occurrence time of the explosion was shorter than at a low air speed. Despite the water mist nozzle being installed outside the enclosure, a propane gas explosion still occurred regardless of the amount of water mist used, failing to suppress the explosion. However, the water mist nozzle installed inside the enclosure supplied an adequate amount of water mist that could wash a part of the propane, resulting in the fuel concentration dropping below the lower explosion limit, hindering the occurrence of an explosion.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114293233&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85114293233&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/07349041211043201
DO - 10.1177/07349041211043201
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85114293233
SN - 0734-9041
VL - 39
SP - 443
EP - 454
JO - Journal of Fire Sciences
JF - Journal of Fire Sciences
IS - 6
ER -