Exploring the nature of switch cost

Inferences from P300 and the lateralized readiness potentials

ShuLan Hsieh, Yen Ting Yu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We describe a protocol to examine various hypothetical models of task switching. This protocol analyzes two event-related potentials - lateralized readiness potential (LRP) and P300 - to infer the roles of advance reconfiguration and carry-over effect on task switching. Participants performed two tasks in a random order. On each trial a task from the previous trial would be repeated, or the other task would be carried out. In one scenario, each stimulus was preceded either by an informative cue specifying which of the two tasks to perform (task-cueing conditions) or by a non-informative cue (no task-cueing conditions). The results showed that the mean reaction time and the stimulus-locked LRP intervals were longer for switch than for repeated trials. This suggested that task switching affected stage processes such as stimulus identification and response selection that occur before the onset of LRP. A further analysis of P300 confined the phenomenon of task switching to the processes that occur after the stimulus identification stage. Moreover, the results of additivity between task cueing and task switching suggested that the two factors affected a distinct stage of processing. A further implication would be that there was no switch-specific control process supporting the view of carry-over effect of switch cost.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49-59
Number of pages11
JournalBrain Research Protocols
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Contingent Negative Variation
Costs and Cost Analysis
Cues
Evoked Potentials
Reaction Time

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

@article{ca8a9ff541764c119e714ed7b09e3291,
title = "Exploring the nature of switch cost: Inferences from P300 and the lateralized readiness potentials",
abstract = "We describe a protocol to examine various hypothetical models of task switching. This protocol analyzes two event-related potentials - lateralized readiness potential (LRP) and P300 - to infer the roles of advance reconfiguration and carry-over effect on task switching. Participants performed two tasks in a random order. On each trial a task from the previous trial would be repeated, or the other task would be carried out. In one scenario, each stimulus was preceded either by an informative cue specifying which of the two tasks to perform (task-cueing conditions) or by a non-informative cue (no task-cueing conditions). The results showed that the mean reaction time and the stimulus-locked LRP intervals were longer for switch than for repeated trials. This suggested that task switching affected stage processes such as stimulus identification and response selection that occur before the onset of LRP. A further analysis of P300 confined the phenomenon of task switching to the processes that occur after the stimulus identification stage. Moreover, the results of additivity between task cueing and task switching suggested that the two factors affected a distinct stage of processing. A further implication would be that there was no switch-specific control process supporting the view of carry-over effect of switch cost.",
author = "ShuLan Hsieh and Yu, {Yen Ting}",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S1385-299X(03)00071-0",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "49--59",
journal = "Brain Research Protocols",
issn = "1385-299X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

Exploring the nature of switch cost : Inferences from P300 and the lateralized readiness potentials. / Hsieh, ShuLan; Yu, Yen Ting.

In: Brain Research Protocols, Vol. 12, No. 1, 01.01.2003, p. 49-59.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring the nature of switch cost

T2 - Inferences from P300 and the lateralized readiness potentials

AU - Hsieh, ShuLan

AU - Yu, Yen Ting

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - We describe a protocol to examine various hypothetical models of task switching. This protocol analyzes two event-related potentials - lateralized readiness potential (LRP) and P300 - to infer the roles of advance reconfiguration and carry-over effect on task switching. Participants performed two tasks in a random order. On each trial a task from the previous trial would be repeated, or the other task would be carried out. In one scenario, each stimulus was preceded either by an informative cue specifying which of the two tasks to perform (task-cueing conditions) or by a non-informative cue (no task-cueing conditions). The results showed that the mean reaction time and the stimulus-locked LRP intervals were longer for switch than for repeated trials. This suggested that task switching affected stage processes such as stimulus identification and response selection that occur before the onset of LRP. A further analysis of P300 confined the phenomenon of task switching to the processes that occur after the stimulus identification stage. Moreover, the results of additivity between task cueing and task switching suggested that the two factors affected a distinct stage of processing. A further implication would be that there was no switch-specific control process supporting the view of carry-over effect of switch cost.

AB - We describe a protocol to examine various hypothetical models of task switching. This protocol analyzes two event-related potentials - lateralized readiness potential (LRP) and P300 - to infer the roles of advance reconfiguration and carry-over effect on task switching. Participants performed two tasks in a random order. On each trial a task from the previous trial would be repeated, or the other task would be carried out. In one scenario, each stimulus was preceded either by an informative cue specifying which of the two tasks to perform (task-cueing conditions) or by a non-informative cue (no task-cueing conditions). The results showed that the mean reaction time and the stimulus-locked LRP intervals were longer for switch than for repeated trials. This suggested that task switching affected stage processes such as stimulus identification and response selection that occur before the onset of LRP. A further analysis of P300 confined the phenomenon of task switching to the processes that occur after the stimulus identification stage. Moreover, the results of additivity between task cueing and task switching suggested that the two factors affected a distinct stage of processing. A further implication would be that there was no switch-specific control process supporting the view of carry-over effect of switch cost.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0043092055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0043092055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1385-299X(03)00071-0

DO - 10.1016/S1385-299X(03)00071-0

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 49

EP - 59

JO - Brain Research Protocols

JF - Brain Research Protocols

SN - 1385-299X

IS - 1

ER -