Field performance of a semi-continuous monitor for ambient PM2.5 water-soluble inorganic ions and gases at a suburban site

Li Hao Young, Chiao Hsin Li, Ming Yeng Lin, Bing Fang Hwang, Hui Tsung Hsu, Yu Cheng Chen, Chau Ren Jung, Kuan Chi Chen, Dung Hung Cheng, Ven Shing Wang, Hung Che Chiang, Perng Jy Tsai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To reduce sampling artifacts and to improve time-resolved measurements of inorganic aerosol system, a recently commercialized semi-continuous In-situ Gas and Aerosol Composition (IGAC) monitoring system was evaluated against a reference annular denuder system (ADS; denuder/two-stage filter pack) at a suburban site over a year, during which the average PM2.5 was 37.0 ± 24.8 μg/m3. A suite of eight ions SO42−, NO3, Cl, NH4+, Na+, K+, Ca2+ and Mg2+ and two gases SO2 and NH3 were the target species. In comparison to the reference ADS method, the IGAC performed well in measuring the major ions SO42−, NO3 and NH4+, and the SO2. For those species, the linear slopes, intercepts and R2 values between the two methods all passed the performance evaluation criteria outlined by earlier similar studies. The performance of IGAC on Cl, Na+, K+ and NH3 was marginally acceptable, whereas Ca2+ and Mg2+ could not be properly evaluated due to the low concentrations (<0.2 μg/m3) and hence inadequate amount of sample size. The ionic balance of the hourly IGAC samples averaged very close to unity, as did the daily ADS samples, though the former was considerably more variable than the latter. The overall performance of the IGAC has been shown to be comparable to other similar monitors and its improvements are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)376-388
Number of pages13
JournalAtmospheric Environment
Volume144
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Nov 1

Fingerprint

aerosol composition
ion
gas
water
monitoring system
artifact
in situ
aerosol
filter
sampling

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Young, Li Hao ; Li, Chiao Hsin ; Lin, Ming Yeng ; Hwang, Bing Fang ; Hsu, Hui Tsung ; Chen, Yu Cheng ; Jung, Chau Ren ; Chen, Kuan Chi ; Cheng, Dung Hung ; Wang, Ven Shing ; Chiang, Hung Che ; Tsai, Perng Jy. / Field performance of a semi-continuous monitor for ambient PM2.5 water-soluble inorganic ions and gases at a suburban site. In: Atmospheric Environment. 2016 ; Vol. 144. pp. 376-388.
@article{17bfee388be7495f897e14fb6a205569,
title = "Field performance of a semi-continuous monitor for ambient PM2.5 water-soluble inorganic ions and gases at a suburban site",
abstract = "To reduce sampling artifacts and to improve time-resolved measurements of inorganic aerosol system, a recently commercialized semi-continuous In-situ Gas and Aerosol Composition (IGAC) monitoring system was evaluated against a reference annular denuder system (ADS; denuder/two-stage filter pack) at a suburban site over a year, during which the average PM2.5 was 37.0 ± 24.8 μg/m3. A suite of eight ions SO42−, NO3−, Cl−, NH4+, Na+, K+, Ca2+ and Mg2+ and two gases SO2 and NH3 were the target species. In comparison to the reference ADS method, the IGAC performed well in measuring the major ions SO42−, NO3− and NH4+, and the SO2. For those species, the linear slopes, intercepts and R2 values between the two methods all passed the performance evaluation criteria outlined by earlier similar studies. The performance of IGAC on Cl−, Na+, K+ and NH3 was marginally acceptable, whereas Ca2+ and Mg2+ could not be properly evaluated due to the low concentrations (<0.2 μg/m3) and hence inadequate amount of sample size. The ionic balance of the hourly IGAC samples averaged very close to unity, as did the daily ADS samples, though the former was considerably more variable than the latter. The overall performance of the IGAC has been shown to be comparable to other similar monitors and its improvements are discussed.",
author = "Young, {Li Hao} and Li, {Chiao Hsin} and Lin, {Ming Yeng} and Hwang, {Bing Fang} and Hsu, {Hui Tsung} and Chen, {Yu Cheng} and Jung, {Chau Ren} and Chen, {Kuan Chi} and Cheng, {Dung Hung} and Wang, {Ven Shing} and Chiang, {Hung Che} and Tsai, {Perng Jy}",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.062",
language = "English",
volume = "144",
pages = "376--388",
journal = "Atmospheric Environment",
issn = "1352-2310",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Field performance of a semi-continuous monitor for ambient PM2.5 water-soluble inorganic ions and gases at a suburban site. / Young, Li Hao; Li, Chiao Hsin; Lin, Ming Yeng; Hwang, Bing Fang; Hsu, Hui Tsung; Chen, Yu Cheng; Jung, Chau Ren; Chen, Kuan Chi; Cheng, Dung Hung; Wang, Ven Shing; Chiang, Hung Che; Tsai, Perng Jy.

In: Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 144, 01.11.2016, p. 376-388.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Field performance of a semi-continuous monitor for ambient PM2.5 water-soluble inorganic ions and gases at a suburban site

AU - Young, Li Hao

AU - Li, Chiao Hsin

AU - Lin, Ming Yeng

AU - Hwang, Bing Fang

AU - Hsu, Hui Tsung

AU - Chen, Yu Cheng

AU - Jung, Chau Ren

AU - Chen, Kuan Chi

AU - Cheng, Dung Hung

AU - Wang, Ven Shing

AU - Chiang, Hung Che

AU - Tsai, Perng Jy

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - To reduce sampling artifacts and to improve time-resolved measurements of inorganic aerosol system, a recently commercialized semi-continuous In-situ Gas and Aerosol Composition (IGAC) monitoring system was evaluated against a reference annular denuder system (ADS; denuder/two-stage filter pack) at a suburban site over a year, during which the average PM2.5 was 37.0 ± 24.8 μg/m3. A suite of eight ions SO42−, NO3−, Cl−, NH4+, Na+, K+, Ca2+ and Mg2+ and two gases SO2 and NH3 were the target species. In comparison to the reference ADS method, the IGAC performed well in measuring the major ions SO42−, NO3− and NH4+, and the SO2. For those species, the linear slopes, intercepts and R2 values between the two methods all passed the performance evaluation criteria outlined by earlier similar studies. The performance of IGAC on Cl−, Na+, K+ and NH3 was marginally acceptable, whereas Ca2+ and Mg2+ could not be properly evaluated due to the low concentrations (<0.2 μg/m3) and hence inadequate amount of sample size. The ionic balance of the hourly IGAC samples averaged very close to unity, as did the daily ADS samples, though the former was considerably more variable than the latter. The overall performance of the IGAC has been shown to be comparable to other similar monitors and its improvements are discussed.

AB - To reduce sampling artifacts and to improve time-resolved measurements of inorganic aerosol system, a recently commercialized semi-continuous In-situ Gas and Aerosol Composition (IGAC) monitoring system was evaluated against a reference annular denuder system (ADS; denuder/two-stage filter pack) at a suburban site over a year, during which the average PM2.5 was 37.0 ± 24.8 μg/m3. A suite of eight ions SO42−, NO3−, Cl−, NH4+, Na+, K+, Ca2+ and Mg2+ and two gases SO2 and NH3 were the target species. In comparison to the reference ADS method, the IGAC performed well in measuring the major ions SO42−, NO3− and NH4+, and the SO2. For those species, the linear slopes, intercepts and R2 values between the two methods all passed the performance evaluation criteria outlined by earlier similar studies. The performance of IGAC on Cl−, Na+, K+ and NH3 was marginally acceptable, whereas Ca2+ and Mg2+ could not be properly evaluated due to the low concentrations (<0.2 μg/m3) and hence inadequate amount of sample size. The ionic balance of the hourly IGAC samples averaged very close to unity, as did the daily ADS samples, though the former was considerably more variable than the latter. The overall performance of the IGAC has been shown to be comparable to other similar monitors and its improvements are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988027095&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988027095&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.062

DO - 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.062

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84988027095

VL - 144

SP - 376

EP - 388

JO - Atmospheric Environment

JF - Atmospheric Environment

SN - 1352-2310

ER -