Fixation strength of unicortical versus bicortical C1-C2 transarticular screws

Steven J. Cyr, Bradford L. Currier, Jason C. Eck, Andrew Foy, Qingshan Chen, Dirk R. Larson, Michael J. Yaszemski, Kai Nan An

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background context: The internal carotid artery and hypoglossal nerve lie over the anterior aspect of the lateral mass of the atlas and are at risk from bicortical C1-C2 transarticular screws. This has led to the recommendation for unicortical screws if the neurovascular structures are in close proximity to the proposed exit point. No data are available on strength of unicortical versus bicortical C1-C2 transarticular screws. Purpose: To compare the biomechanical pullout strength of unicortical versus bicortical C1-C2 transarticular screws in a cadaveric model. Study design: Biomechanical study. Methods: Fifteen cervical spine specimens underwent axial pullout testing. A unicortical C1-C2 transarticular screw was placed on one side with a contralateral bicortical screw. Data were analyzed to reveal any significant differences in strength. Results: Mean pullout strength for the bicortical C1-C2 transarticular screws was 1,048.8 (±360.1) N versus 939.2 (±360.6) for unicortical screws (p=.22). There was no significant difference in the pullout strength of unicortical and bicortical screws. Conclusions: In cases with satisfactory bone quality, it appears reasonable to use unicortical screws to avoid the risk of neurovascular injury from penetrating the anterior cortex of C1.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)661-665
Number of pages5
JournalSpine Journal
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Jul

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Fixation strength of unicortical versus bicortical C1-C2 transarticular screws'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this