TY - JOUR
T1 - Flank facilitation and contour integration
T2 - Different sites
AU - Huang, Pi Chun
AU - Hess, Robert F.
AU - Dakin, Steven C.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by a CIHR (3108-18) Grant to R.F.H. and a BBSRC Grant to S.C.D. The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers’ suggestions.
PY - 2006/10
Y1 - 2006/10
N2 - Observers' ability to integrate features into extended contours, and to exploit the flanking structure to facilitate contrast detection (flank facilitation), exhibit a similar dependence on element spacing and orientation. Here, we investigate whether this reflects the operation of a common cortical mechanism by comparing performance for both tasks under monocular, binocular, dichoptic, and stereoscopic viewing conditions. Our results clearly implicate different cortical sites for flank-facilitated detection and contour integration; the former is a purely monocular phenomenon and must therefore occur at the earliest stages of cortical processing. In contrast, contour integration is a binocular process and occurs after the encoding of relative disparity, suggesting substantial extra-striate involvement. We conclude that the sites, and therefore the mechanisms, underlying these two seemingly related psychophysical phenomena are different.
AB - Observers' ability to integrate features into extended contours, and to exploit the flanking structure to facilitate contrast detection (flank facilitation), exhibit a similar dependence on element spacing and orientation. Here, we investigate whether this reflects the operation of a common cortical mechanism by comparing performance for both tasks under monocular, binocular, dichoptic, and stereoscopic viewing conditions. Our results clearly implicate different cortical sites for flank-facilitated detection and contour integration; the former is a purely monocular phenomenon and must therefore occur at the earliest stages of cortical processing. In contrast, contour integration is a binocular process and occurs after the encoding of relative disparity, suggesting substantial extra-striate involvement. We conclude that the sites, and therefore the mechanisms, underlying these two seemingly related psychophysical phenomena are different.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748430635&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748430635&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.visres.2006.04.025
DO - 10.1016/j.visres.2006.04.025
M3 - Article
C2 - 16806389
AN - SCOPUS:33748430635
SN - 0042-6989
VL - 46
SP - 3699
EP - 3706
JO - Vision Research
JF - Vision Research
IS - 21
ER -